How did migration lead to the population of the world?

Social Studies

2 answers:

Paladinen [302]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Migration affect the population of the two particular areas. It increases the population of the place (new place), where people migrate in search of good facilities and decreases the population of the area where people migrate from. It is an unnatural cause that changes the population. 0.0

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

meriva3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

According to the Out Of Africa hypothesis, which is currently the dominant view in paleoanthropology and related fields, humans (Homo sapiens) evolved on the African continent and then spread to the rest of the world via migration. From their, they evolved slightly differently, for example having slightly different facial features.

Corrected by Wolf39 and Google.

You might be interested in

The European country with the area that receives the highest amount of precipitation is_____.

DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

Explanation: Polano

4 0

3 years ago

F significance

pashok25 [27]

F is significantly larger so it’s d

3 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP DUE TOMORROW

const2013 [10]

It is this system that has got us in the situation we’re in today, and keeps us there. And it is through revolution to get rid of this system that we ourselves can bring a much better system into being. The ultimate goal of this revolution is communism: A world where people work and struggle together for the common good

6 0

3 years ago

What would be the federal government’s biggest problem if a war was imminent?

pychu [463]

Depends on who the war is with, however universal concerns would be logistics, monetary backing and manpower to fight the war.

8 0

3 years ago

In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shout

Ket [755]

Answer:

<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>

Explanation:

Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.

However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.

6 0

3 years ago