The Black freedom struggle was one of the potent ways through which gay rights were fought for in the mid 20th century America.
One of the earliest know freedom struggles were the Dewey’s sit in after three teenagers were denied services at the restaurant because they were thought to be Gay.
<h3>
What was the Dewey's Sit-in?</h3>
The Dewey's sit-in was a series of protest carried out in the united states in 1965 to bring awareness to gay rights.
Adopting the lunch-counter sit-in strategy of the black civil rights movement, protesters held the nation's first successful LGBT sit-in in the spring of 1965 at Dewey's restaurant.
This restaurant was located at the Rittenhouse Square section of Philadelphia, Dewey's was a popular hangout after the bars closed.
Learn more about Gay rights at brainly.com/question/24078961
#SPJ1
The US Patriot Act has one big controversy about it. It is the part of it where it states ''other purposes''. While the rest of the act is specifically focused on certain things, the part ''other purposes'' is not specific, and it opens up the door for actions that are not against terrorism. It has been argued that this part of the act is actually enabling the US authorities to act against alleged future criminal activities, and treat the people that they suspect that may do a criminal activity in the future as criminals, despite them having done anything against the law, and using a method that is not a sure indicator by any means.
The correct answer is A) By centralizing the government and breaking the area into regions and then provinces.
Chandragupta Maurya achieved control over such a large empire by centralizing the government and breaking the area into regions and then provinces.
What he does was take full control of the government by centralizing the main administrative activities of the empire so he could oversee the most important aspects of the government. He divided the territory into provinces to better handle the administration of each one. He also allowed the creation of a group of counselors or ministers that formed a council to support the administration.
Suggesting that the king was bound to the will of the people as well as the law
