Let Ted be x.
Ed is 7 years older = x + 7
Ed = (3/4)Ted
(x + 7) = (3/4)x
x + 7 = 3x/4
x - 3x/4 = -7
x/4 = -7
x = -28, Ted = -28 years.
(x + 7) = -28 + 7 = -21, Ed = -21 years
Goodness. We had negative numbers for the ages, well does that make sense? No it doesn't.
Our answer is correct. But the sense in the question is lacking. The question has been wrongly set.
<span>We might assume negative ages to mean before they came into the world, before birth! </span>
211,135.71 merry christmas
Answer:
A sample size of at least 1,353,733 is required.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of , and a confidence level of , we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

In which
z is the zscore that has a pvalue of .
The margin of error is:

98% confidence level
So
, z is the value of Z that has a pvalue of
, so
.
You would like to be 98% confident that you esimate is within 0.1% of the true population proportion. How large of a sample size is required?
We need a sample size of at least n.
n is found when M = 0.001.
Since we don't have an estimate for the proportion, we use the worst case scenario, that is 
So






Rounding up
A sample size of at least 1,353,733 is required.
I'm going to assume that you are asking how a number can have two factors.
So, a factor is an integer (non-fractional/decimal number) you multiply by another integer to get the actual number.
Well, let's look at the number 4. The number four has the following factors:
1, 2, 4
In a 'rainbow' style, you match the two outer numbers, then the two next inner numbers, and so on.
Because the number '2' is the one in the center and there is no other number to multiply it by, it must multiply by itself to reach the number 4.
Well, you must have two numbers to actually multiply together, so every number has two factors: 1, and itself (except for 0).
I hope this helps, and good luck :)