This is true, not having a navy has shown itself to be a weakness of many nations/civilizations in the past. And there are also good reasons why this is so. Not having a navy strongly impacts a civilizations ability to maneuver around certain points and go around them. It also limits the ability to trade with other natons. Not to mention the additional value of having the firepower of ships (those that had cannons later on at least).
Answer: complex and effective.
Explanation:
Edgn. 2020
<span>south american country is home to most of the continents rainforests is </span>Brazil
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not mention what crisis you are referring to.
Without that information, we do not know what you are talking about.
However, trying to help, we can assume you are talking about the Cold War crisis because it was the Soviet Union that coined that phrase after the Cold War years.
So if that is teh case, what would happen to the idea of peaceful co-existence as a result of this crisis was that the two world superpowers of that time -the Soviet Union and the United States- had to learn to live in relative coexistence and "peace," after so many years of competing in the arms race, the space race, and the spread-containment of Communism around the world.
These countries had to learn how to coexists, more for necessity, rather than conviction.
Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld the warrantless searches of an automobile, which is known as the automobile exception. The case has also been cited as widening the scope of warrantless search.
