Answer:
No, they are not equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:
E
Step-by-step explanation:
its the only one that make sense
First look for the fundamental solutions by solving the homogeneous version of the ODE:

The characteristic equation is

with roots
and
, giving the two solutions
and
.
For the non-homogeneous version, you can exploit the superposition principle and consider one term from the right side at a time.

Assume the ansatz solution,



(You could include a constant term <em>f</em> here, but it would get absorbed by the first solution
anyway.)
Substitute these into the ODE:




is already accounted for, so assume an ansatz of the form



Substitute into the ODE:





Assume an ansatz solution



Substitute into the ODE:



So, the general solution of the original ODE is

Given situation : 0.5 pound of peaches selling for 0.80 dollars/ pound
0.7 pound of oranges selling for 0.90 dollars / pound.
Solution
Given number 1 : Peaches
=> 0.5 pound = meaning, ½ pound is available, And 1 pound of it costs 0.80 dollars.
Let’s solve:
=> 0.80 dollars * 0.5
=> 0.40 dollars – the price of the peaches.
Given number 2 : Oranges
=> 0.7 pounds of oranges, meaning less than 1 pound. And 1 pound costs 0.90 dollars
Let’s solve to get the anwer
=> 0.7 * .90
=> 0.63 dollars – the costs of 0.7 pounds of oranges,