Answer: You are trying to find out if the statement is true or false? It is FALSE.
Explanation: Analysts should be concerned with the material movements in the company's financial statements. Although as stated in the question, small changes could amount to material movement but that applies in situations where there is a huge outflow but at the same time, there is similar inflow, so the net effect is negligible on a particular financial statements line item. This instance is not relevant to financial analysts but only the concern of internal control and or internal audit.
Financial analysts are interested in what the key drivers of the financial statements are. These drivers in most cases are an avenue to explain what has transpired in the financials between the current period and the preceding one by way of writing a commentary and providing a succinct and holistic explanation of the financial statements.
It would be time consuming and too operational if analysts are concerned with every percentage movement in the financial statements.
Answer:
The exception is due to vacation.
Explanation:
This is an example of a right answer, while, yes the individual must be registered in Canada, the exception is due to vacation.
The appropriate response is sales revenue. Revenue is the measure of cash that an organization really gets amid a particular period, including rebates and conclusions for returned stock. It is the "best line" or "gross pay" figure from which costs are subtracted to decide net salary.
The elements that would have to be in place for a contract to be unconscionable would be that
- They were under pressure
- They were misled
- They did not have the right information
<h3>What is meant by a contract?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that two people or more have agreed to do business with themselves.
In order to be a contract, one person would have to create a bargain and the other would be the one that would agree to the terms.
It is unconscionable at the time when the contract is done and the person or one of the parties is found not to have been able to make the contract agreement at their right frame of mind. In this case, the law has the power to protect this party.
Hence they would have to rule in his favor. Therefore to be unconscionable, a contract would have to have been misled, have been made under duress and without the adequate information.
Read more on contracts here:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
Answer: A. equal to marginal cost where it intersects the demand curve
Explanation:
In a pure competition, the market is efficient because it balances demand and supply and gives an equilibrium price that takes both of them into account.
In this market, the price is equal to the marginal revenue of a firm and the profit maximizing level of production is where the marginal revenue intersects the marginal cost.
The efficient level is therefore where price equals marginal cost. The same goes for a natural monopoly. If economic efficiency is to be achieved, the natural monopoly's price must equal the marginal cost at the equilibrium price.
