Answer: false
Explanation:
The statement is false because cost leadership is not really sustainable as it's cost effective due to the maintenance charge required to keep them in a great care despite the low operational cost being runned by the organization
Answer:
The statement given is TRUE:
Explanation: Most of CBMS left in 2008, there was vacuum that was left. Banks just decided to clean up their balance sheets, and did not participate. The life insurance companies took advantage of this period and increased their origination and thus increased the lending to this sector where there was a huge vacuum.
Answer:
2nd place
Explanation:
I feel like this is the right answer, I'm just guessing.
Based on the statement above their need to separate the employee first because there is an employee get bonus and dont. so the correct order of steps to determine the significant result are: c. B,E,D,C,A
hope this help
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
