No, you do not have to own stocks yourself to be impacted by the change of the markets. Anybody who owns stocks AND run businesses that YOU go too will impact YOU dramatically. If stock prices drop, the amount of money they have will drop considerably, which means they have less money for merchandise. If they don't have merchandise, the businesses will go out, and you will not have anyplace to go too for your needs (for food, medicine, etc)
hope this helps
Answer:
d. current ratio, acid-test ratio, accounts receivable turnover, and inventory turnover.
Explanation:
For determining the company short term debt paying ability, the liquidity ratios are used i.e current ratio, acid test ratio, account receivable turnover and inventory ratio
By using this ratios the company could able to analyze their liquidity that means they have the sufficient balance to pay off the short term debt or liability i.e current liabilities moreover the time period is maximum 1 year for paying off the short term liabilities
Answer:
the after tax rate of return = yield x ( 1 - tax rate)
- AT&T bonds after tax rate of return = 9.75% x ( 1 - 40%) = 9.75% x 60% = 5.85%
- State of Florida municipal bonds after tax rate of return = 5% (no tax rate)
- AT&T preferred stock after tax rate of return = 8.25% x [1 - (40% x 30%)] = 8.25% x (1 - 12%) = 8.25% x 88% = 7.26%
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Outsourcing refers to a practice where a firm seeks out an external party to provide services that would have otherwise been provided by staff of the firm. Here a customer assistance center in India is contracted. One of the advantages of outsourcing is that it results in cost savings.
However, confidentiality of company information could be compromised via outsourcing, and competitors could have access to trade secrets of such firms.
The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.