1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denpristay [2]
3 years ago
15

10 ptsssssssssssssssssss

English
2 answers:
Stels [109]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer would be the Filipino people (A)

Zielflug [23.3K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a. How the US takeover affects the Filipino people.

Explanation:

Both of the comments of Mark Twain and Theodore Roosevelt are concerning the American government's power over the island of Philippines. Though said in two different years, they both comment on the people of Philippines' conditions, but in a contrasting manner.

Twain talks about the negative impact of the United States' control of the island while Roosevelt's comments points out the positive outcome of the takeover. He said that the people of Philippines should be happy and appreciate the American's coming for they are now enjoying freedom which they had previously never had.

Thus, the main difference between the two comments is how the US takeover affects the Filipino people.

You might be interested in
What is the difference between the scirrhous cancer and the encephaloid cancer?
Rashid [163]

The correct option is:

D ) The scirrhous cancer is a cancer in which the growth is a very hard tumor, and the encephaloid tumor is soft.


Explanation:

Epithelioma. Scirrhous cancer, or exhausting cancer, within which the framework predominates, and therefore the tumor is of exhausting consistence and slow growth. Encephaloid cancer, Medullary cancer, or Soft cancer, within which the cellular part predominates, and therefore the tumour is soft, grows rapidly, and sometimes ulcerates.

5 0
3 years ago
Reread the passage. Look for specific terms you can replace with general phrases.
Marizza181 [45]

The figurative language used in the passage above is a symbolism as well as a metaphor for the Law of Peace which now extended to all the nations of the Iroquois. One could say that it also symbolized the protection that peace affords under the Iroquois Constitution that has been extended to all members of the Iroquois Nations. See more explanation below.

<h3>Further explanation with regard to the above?</h3>

The Iroquois constitution was the outcome of the Confederacy of the Five Nations, which included the

  • Mohawk,
  • Onondaga,
  • Seneca,
  • Oneida, and
  • Cayuga Native American tribes.

It was one of the first systems of governance in North America. The Great Tree of Peace was one of their most important traditions.

The tree itself represented the five nations' understanding and maintenance of peace (On the words of The Covenant:

"The tree signifies law and the law is peace among all nations"). The branches, on the other hand, were viewed as the security that peace provided to all Confederacy members ("The branches of this tree signify shelter, giving each individual protection and security under the law. These branches are tended by those among the people who are men").

Learn more about figurative language:
brainly.com/question/809737

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Why read poetry?!?!
ohaa [14]

Answer:POETRY HELPS YOU UNDERSTAND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF WORDS THEMSELVES

Explanation:

im just kidding, because  a teacher wants to make us learn more than we have to and thts frustrating

8 0
3 years ago
Choose the word most nearly opposite in meaning to - ambiguous
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

some are unambiguous, univocal, plain, unclear

these are just some of the antonyms

6 0
2 years ago
“The Happy Man” is a satire, a story that uses humor to criticize elements of society. What elements of society is the story cri
sertanlavr [38]

The elements of society the story 'The Happy Man' is criticizing are: demands of jobs, death, and politics.

<u>Explanation:</u>

‘The Happy Man’ is a short story written by Naguib Mahfouz which gives its readers a deep message. The author have made use of satire wherein he criticizes some aspects of society by using humor.

This is a story about a man who finds himself extremely happy one morning. As the story moves forward, the author depicts that there’s no such thing as a perfect life or perfect happiness, because happiness is a myth.

Through the example of the happy man, the author criticizes the demands of job that is put to an employees, in the story the happy man works as a writer at local newspaper. Apart from this, the other elements of society are also been criticized which includes death, and the politics.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can learning about an authors personal life enchanted the readers experience when reading a story by that author?
    5·2 answers
  • What theme of the play Hamlet is apparent in these lines?
    9·2 answers
  • The difficult journey what is something that person does? why do you think that person does that?
    13·1 answer
  • How is the bolded word being used?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST explains the difference between Florence's and
    11·2 answers
  • Is the underlined commentary in the excerpt effective
    8·2 answers
  • Read the passage. When an epidemic of physical disease starts to spread, the community approves and joins in a quarantine of the
    9·2 answers
  • Which option best states the main idea of the
    7·1 answer
  • A package of paper straws comes with 200 straws, and 25% of them have a polka dot design. How many of the paper straws have polk
    10·1 answer
  • Which definition would best define cob in the passage?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!