1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MissTica
4 years ago
9

During the debate over california's statehood which political figure refused to compromise regarding the expansion of slavery?

History
2 answers:
Vladimir [108]4 years ago
7 0
The answer is B. John Calhon
alexdok [17]4 years ago
3 0
I believe it was (C) John C. Calhoun.

It was Henry Clay who had drafted the Compromise of 1850 which had failed to pass due to the strong wave of opposition towards the compromise led by John C. Calhoun who was pro-slavery.
You might be interested in
What is the Indian Removal Act and how does it fit with the American ideals of freedom, equality, and democracy?
irina [24]

Answer:

La Indian Removal Act (o Ley de Traslado Forzoso de los Indios)1​ de 1830 fue una ley aprobada por el 21º Congreso de Estados Unidos para facilitar el traslado de las tribus amerindias que vivían al este del río Misissippi de Estados Unidos a terren.o

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How each was a reflection of changes in early 20th century American society, and how society reacted to
Fofino [41]

Answer:

The Harlem Renaissance was the development of the Harlem neighborhood in NYC as a black cultural mecca in the early 20th century they reacted as something that africans can come to eachother and enjoy

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which two groups of people benefited from the reforms of the progressive era?
Kisachek [45]
As in any era where reforms happen, there are winners, and losers.

The rich, Big Business benefit the most, while the middle and lower classes benefit the least
The unions benefit in that more people are wont to join for the protection they offer, and for a fair deal.
Consumers may benefit in the short term, however as we see, prices always go up, and quality always go down.

Women, Children, and the African Americans are the least groups to benefit, or were many years ago, as they had no real champions for their cause.
Hope this helps!!!!
6 0
3 years ago
Amendment V. Then describe three present-day situations where this law might give a citizen important protections from a potenti
adoni [48]
One situation would be the double-jeopardy. It is a situation when the country wants to put you on trial multiple times. According to the fifth amendment, a federal court can't put you on trial multiple times for the same offense. This is done to prevent having the federal court put you on trial until the jury decides that you're guilty. If a case is acquitted then there can be no retrial.

Another situation is self-incrimination. If you know what you've done or haven't done and you don't want to talk about it then you don't have to talk about it. The amendment protects you from having to divulge information that might incriminate you even further. It is your right to remain silent.

Another situation is having a grand jury. Only a grand jury may indict a person. In a real life situation, a court might decide to decide that you're guilty and punish you without a jury in case you were a political opponent or something similar. This is unconstitutional and illegal and the fifth amendment protects you from it.
<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
Ulleksa [173]

Answer: B

Explanation: Fifteenth

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What late 19th century government believe that it had contributed remarkable achievements inventions and invitations to the worl
    6·2 answers
  • What were two things severely hurting the Soviet economy just prior to its fall?
    14·1 answer
  • What led to the establishment of the state of Israel
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME !!<br> BRAINLIEST WILL BE GIVEN TO BEST ANSWER<br> BUT ONLY IF 2 PPL ANSWER
    14·1 answer
  • How the telecommuting impact the economy?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME ILL GIVE YOU BRAINEST. what is inaccurate about this paragraph and explain why it is. It has to be something in t
    13·1 answer
  • He Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) ruled that people had the right to this regardless of the severity of the crim
    10·2 answers
  • Match the statements to the appropriate religion(s).
    10·2 answers
  • The rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s was a rise against...
    8·1 answer
  • Participants in the tennis court oath swore to continue meeting until they were able to bring about
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!