Probably something with a huge value
The correct answer is plumbing
Answer and Explanation:
The classification is as follows:
Alex could easily measured that Panaview have the less price - Unit of account as the money represent the measurement of unit of price
Alex saved $30 per week - Store of value as Alex is saving for use the money in near future
Alex pays $140 - Medium of exchange. In this alex would pay the money to purchase the Blu-ray
The SAFE act assures the payment of otherwise non-collectable court judgments against licensees who have committed fraud, misrepresentation, deceit, or conversion of trust funds in a transaction.
<h3>What is the SAFE act?</h3>
This was the act in the United States that made it mandatory for houses to be registered and licensed.
The act is based on houses that are used as residences. The full meaning of the act is the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act.
The main purpose of the SAFE act is to try to ensure that consumers are protected and also help in the reduction of fraud. This would be done by setting a standard for licensing and the originators of mortgage loans.
Hence the correct answer to the question is the SAFE act.
Read more on court judgement here; brainly.com/question/14077067
#SPJ1
Answer:
Jobs argument
Explanation:
-The national-security argument states that some industries have to be protected by imposing tariffs to maintain the local production in case of a war.
-The unfair-competition argument says that the domestic market has to be protected when there is unfair competition because companies from other countries are subject to different regulations.
-Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument states that the threat of imposing a restriction can help to eliminate a restriction that was imposed by another country.
-Infant-industry argument says that new industries have to be protected because they don't have economies of scales that their competitors from others countries have.
-The jobs argument claims that the trade with other countries eliminates the local jobs.
According to this, the answer is that the senator is using the jobs argument to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods because he claims that it is necessary to impose those restrictions to protect the workers from losing their jobs.
