The objects that are actually represented in each of the four color photographs are:
- King Tut's funeral mask.
- Smelting pot.
- Three coins and
- Hieroglyphics.
The other objects that were found in Tutankhamun's tomb but do not appear in these five photographs are:
<h3>About "Fit for a King: Treasures of Tutankhamun"</h3>
"Fit for a King: Treasures of Tutankhamun" is known to be an essay that talks about what King Tutankhamun actually wanted to be buried with. He thought to be buried with what he had that was valuable to him. He also needed them in afterlife.
We see that the objects that were actually represented in the four color photographs were found in the valley of kings near Luxor, Egypt.
Learn more about "Fit for a King: Treasures of Tutankhamun" on brainly.com/question/26473527
Give you their denotations.
Answer:
Explanation:
Give evidence and explain it in order to receive credit!!!
Make sure you have a claim and in your claim don’t give evidence.
And in your conclusion do not say “in conclusion”
But our political compact, our social contract<span>, is under real strain.</span>
The social hierarchy is an unavoidable reality in Britain, and it is interesting to watch it play out in the work of a socialist playwright. Shaw includes members of all social classes from the lowest (Liza) to the servant class (Mrs. Pearce<span>) to the middle class (Doolittle after his inheritance) to the genteel poor (the Eynsford Hills) to the upper class (Pickering and the Higginses). The general sense is that class structures are rigid and should not be tampered with, so the example of Liza's class mobility is most shocking. The issue of language is tied up in class quite closely; the fact that Higgins is able to identify where people were born by their accents is telling. British class and identity are very much tied up in their land and their birthplace, so it becomes hard to be socially mobile if your accent marks you as coming from a certain location.
</span>
