Personally if I were to answer this base on my own polite opinion, if a document reaches me, and it requires me to perform some action, I would do it immediately if it <span>seems important but not urgent.
The answer is letter B then.</span>
Answer:
Because the all works that we did done and thinks to doing need some rules. Every thing in this world pepole looks this is wrong. We have to understand our culture because we live in the frame. The frame is culture anyone cqnt change it. Political like a game. Every politicions working for luxury life. They never think about the denziens of their country. As i think this is rhw reasone to understand the political.Socity is very diffrent. Always it full of curropution. we have to carefull of our self always.
So this is my answer you can add some to your self..
The company should improve their distribution management.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Distribution management describes the process of managing the transport of goods from the supplier or retailer to the point of purchase.
It is an overriding term that applies to a number of activities and methods, such as packaging, stock, warehousing, supply chain, and transportation.
For the business ' financial success and corporate success, the adoption of a distribution management strategy is crucial.
Distribution management helps to maintain organization and satisfies customers.
The basic idea of distribution management as a marketing tool is that distribution management takes place in an environment that also includes the following aspects:
Product, Price, Promotion and placement (4 P’s)
Answer:
Description 2017 2016 2015
Net Income $146,402 $107,281 $123,114
Explanation:
The question is to compute a statement of income comparative figures. The step is therefore to use the weighted average pricing method to replace the historical income before taxes for both years 2016 and 2015. After this is done, we then re-calculate the appropriate taxes and arrive at the net income.
Description 2017 2016 2015
Income before taxes 206,200 151,100 173,400
Subtract: Income tax @29% 59,798 43,819 50,286
Net Income 146,402 107,281 123,114
Answer:
a)
To my view, the MD viewpoint is better. In companies the existing process is usually analyzed and the pain points identified whenever there is a need for change. The new system is simply a change to the existing system. The stakeholders' specific needs are not completely addressed. The MD calls for a collection of and analysis of demands from scratch to share its needs , requirements and inhibitions between the principal stakeholders. The CIO and their staff would be able to assess in the requirements review process what worked and what did not work well for the organization.
In assessing the current process, the CIO and his team will align their thinking process with the pain points and correct the existing system. They are not going to build the system in a fresh light. A new system that meets the needs of stakeholders can be developed. For everybody, this is a win-win situation. The point of view of MD is therefore more logical and related.
b)
In the particular case, the most logical and comprehensive system analysis method is:
Primary stakeholder requirements collection: Primary stakeholders using the system must be consulted on their specific requirements and needs. It is also necessary to consider the limitations identified by stakeholders.
Comprehension of existing system and pain points: the current system can be analysed based on requirements collection and pain points can be emphasized in the current system.
A new system that will win for everyone: the new system must primarily comply with the needs of the stakeholders.
Presentation and approval of the system blueprint to stakeholders
Development and implementation of the system: system development can be carried out by the agile method of sprinting.
Monitoring and control of the system: to check for performance deviations, the system implemented should be observed. In order to monitor deviations, specific intervention can be implemented.
