Answer:
a. For each country, graph the production possibilities frontier. Suppose that without trade the workers in each country spend half their time producing each good. Identify this point in your graphs.
b. Who has the comparative advantage in the production of shirts? What about for computers?
- China has the comparative advantage in the production of shirts, while the US has the comparative advantage in the production of computers. 
c. If these countries were open to trade, which country would export shirts? Give a specific numerical example and show it on your graphs. Which country would benefit from trade?
- China would export 50 million shirts in exchange for 5 million computers (or more if they can). Trade would benefit the US since it will only need to trade 5 million computers in exchange for 50 million shirts, and it will still have 15 million computers that it can consume or trade with come other country. 
d. Explain at what price of computers (in terms of shirts) the two countries might trade.
- the minimum and maximum prices would be 5 to 10 shirts per computer. If the price of shirts per computer is 10 or near 10, then the US wins more. If the price of shirts per computer is 5 or near 5, then China wins more. 
Explanation:
opportunity cost of producing 1 shirt in the US = 20/100 = 0.2 computers
opportunity cost of producing 1 computer in the US = 100/20 = 5 shirts
opportunity cost of producing 1 shirt in China = 10/100 = 0.1 computers
opportunity cost of producing 1 computer in China = 100/10 = 10 shirts
without trade:
- total production of shirts in the US = 50 million
- total production of computer in the US = 10 million
- total production of shirts in China = 50 million
- total production of computer in China = 5 million
with trade:
- total production of computers in the US = 20 million
- total production of shirts in China = 100 million
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:  No,the company is not guilty.
Explanation:  In the given case, Hines could not be considered guilty of price discrimination as the price charged from different shops was same. The free samples were distributed for the purpose of campaign and the discretion to which shop they want to provide lies completely with the company. 
Price discrimination refers to the practice of charging different prices from different customer which the company have definitely not done. 
Hence, Hines could not be charged of guilty of price discrimination.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Value of cash received is :
10,000 shares x $75
=$750,000
And that's a debit as it is shown in the question because cash was received.
Now the credit side.
Value of preferred stock is $50
So we have:
$50 x 10,000 shares
=$500,000 preferred shares.
Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par ValuePreferred Stock is $25 ($75 -$50)
So the value will be $25 x $10,000
=$250,000
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct answer is option B. 
Explanation:
As people are using more tablets and fewer television sets, the demand for television sets will decline. This will cause the demand curve to shift to the left. As a result, the price level will decline.  
Now, with new production technique the cost of production declines. As a result, there will be an increase in the supply as the firm will be able to produce more at the same cost. This will cause the supply curve to shift to the right. This rightward shift in the supply curve may lead to an increase or decrease in the quantity of output. It depends on the extent of change in supply. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Tariffs, non-tariffs, import quotas and voluntary export restraints