Answer:
No, the court would not have been so lenient with her.
Explanation:
Whether or not Carmela was passive in the situation or she was only guiding her father on how to go about the lawsuit, the court has every right and would have included her in the lawsuit with her father. This is so because her father and she would have been included in the lawsuit in default. Hence, it is not a matter of decency or not, but a matter of what is supposed to be.
Answer:
Party system
Explanation:
The party system is originated from European scholars, especially James Bryce and Moisey Ostrogorsky
The party system refers to the system and arrangement of political parties in a political system or democratic state. It encompasses such things as the number of parties, party dominance, Party structure and similarities. Giovanni satori is known to have come up with the most preferred ways of classifying party systems. more commonly there are multi-party systems, single party sytems and two party system
Answer:
Increase the amount of time he practices the skill and reward good skips
Explanation:
There are clear differences between the ability of children and adults to process information throughout development, there are critical periods in the development of thinking and information processing skills, the differences lie not so much in sensory recording capacity as in the processing of information. Evidence of processing speed is still unclear, but in principle children process individual stimuli more slowly. For this reason, in the case of the child exposed in the question, you should increase the amount of time the child practices the skill and reward it for good skips.
<span>In a self-fulfilling prophecy, the assertion was originally
"false", and becomes
"true".</span>
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a forecast that specifically or in a roundabout way makes
it turn out to be valid, by the very terms of the prediction itself, because of
positive input amongst conviction and conduct. Robert K. Merton made this term
in 1948 to portray a bogus meaning of the circumstance bringing out another
conduct, which influences the initially false origination to be true.
