Answer: You have just committed an attributional bias called: fundamental attribution error.
Explanation: attributional bies reffers to errors made when people try to explain their own behaviour or other's people behaviour based on their own analysis of social situations. In this case, it's a fundamental attribution error because Mark is making an assumption on Allison's behaviour not considering the influence of situational factors and overemphasising the role of dispositional factors such as the distraction Allison may have in her current actions.
Answer:
aa
Explanation:
<u>De facto knowledge:</u>
It is used to describe that is something exist but that is not officially accepted and recognized. It is not the fact, but it is something about the facts. It comes from a Latin phrase that means in reality over as a matter of facts in legal contexts, de facto describes what happens.
<u>Priori knowledge:
</u>
Priori means what is before were used in the philosophy that originally to distinguishes between arguments from the causes and arguments from the effects. Here are arguments of prior said to cause to the effect.
Answer:
Labeling.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests, the process of labeling involves classifying a student with a label, usually due to their ability, potential, attitude or behaviour. In this case, the student who acts bored (who could act like this because the class itself is boring, not because he is a bad student) is being labeled as a bad student by a teacher. Even though in this case this process ends up being negative, it could happen the other way round: he could participate a lot, have good grades and then he would be classified as a good student.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
