Answer:
High reliability and low validity
Explanation:
It was stated that the children took the test twice and had similar scores, hence the test has high reliability because it produces the same or similar results under the same conditions. Validity is tested to see how the results of the study really measured what they were intended to, checking how the results is in line with concepts and theories, and if the results are reproducible. In this case, Allans contained only multiplication problems and hence has low validity.
Answer:
nice i love your introduction
There are different kinds of rules. The second component of religious freedom guarantees that people can believe what they want to believe and is called the free exercise clause.
<h3>
Freedom of religion </h3>
This is said to be in two major categories. The first prevents the government from establishing a state-sponsored religion, promoting, or preferring religion.
Everyone has the equal right to freedom that pertains to thought, conscience and religion.
Learn more about Freedom of religion from
brainly.com/question/81196
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.