<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
<u> A. Most PACs associated with interest groups can only collect funds from group members.</u>
<u>The Political Action Committees (PAC) can only raise money through members' donations; the members generally consist of corporations, labor unions, trade associations, other types of organizations, and individuals.</u>
B. and C are incorrect because the PACs' funds are destined to finance political campaigns of candidates and political parties who support a certain cause or belief, and not to finance in services like health care for an interest group's members.
D. is incorrect as well as $5000 is not the minimum amount they can donate, in fact, it is the maximum. In the United States, a PAC can contribute to a political campaign up to $5,000 to a candidate per election, $15,000 to a party per year and $5,000 to another PAC per year. And they can receive up to $5,000 from any one individual, PAC or party committee per year.
Answer:
High versus low context
Explanation:
High context refers to societies or groups where people have close connections over a long period of time. Many aspects of cultural behavior are not made explicit because most members know what to do and what to think from years of interaction with each other. Your family is probably an example of a high context environment.
Low context refers to societies where people tend to have many connections but of shorter duration or for some specific reason. In these societies, cultural behavior and beliefs may need to be spelled out explicitly so that those coming into the cultural environment know how to behave.
Answer:
Explanation:
First of all i will tell the person to come to me after work so that i will not embarrass him in front of our co-workers.then after work when he comes to me i will talk to him about how its unfair to make such a comment for someone religious belief cause just because the persons belief is different from yours that doesn't you should do something like that. he entitled to his own and your entitled to yours .so as conclusion after that i will tell him to not do it again. and apologize to whoever he made a rude comment about his religious beliefs .
hope this helps.
Answer:
The idea is to respect the right of the participants, and the reputation of the psychologist.
Explanation:
The ideas behind ethical practices in psychology are that you need to respect the rights of the research participants and make sure they do not get harmed by what you are doing.
Psychologists must go along with this because they need to protect their research participants, the reputation of psychology and psychologists.
