Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
The answer is A "Colonial merchants once nailed advertisements on posts in front of their stores." please marl me as brainliest
Answer:
r = 9.86%
Explanation:
The formula for calculating the future value of an invested amount yielding a compound interest is given by:
where:
FV = future value = $16,000
PV = present value = $10,000
r = interest rate = ?
n = number of compounding period per year = 1
t = time in years = 5
∴ 
dividing both sides by 10,000
to remove the power of 5, we have to take the 5th root of both sides:
Using your calculator:
1.09856 = 1 + r
∴ r = 1.09856 - 1 = 0.09856
r = 0.0986 = 9.86%
∴ r = 9.86%
Answer:
more than
earn interest
discount cash flow (DCF)
Explanation:
The concept of future value represents the amount that a lump sum or series of cash flows will achieve after a given period when compounded at an interest rate. This means that a dollar in hand today is worth more than a dollar to be received since it can be applied to earn interest.
The time value of money, which allows us to evaluate different investments, is also known as discount cash flow (DCF).
