According to Fiedler's contingency model of leadership, a leader's performance depends on their own styles and how much control and influence they have over the circumstance.
<h3>What is Fiedler's theory of contingent leadership?</h3>
According to Fiedler's Contingency Theory, a leader's leadership style needs to be appropriate for the circumstances in order to be effective. You can use this model to determine your own leadership style, evaluate the situation that calls for leadership, and assess whether you are the best candidate.
Consider a basketball team as a first example of using Fiedler's model, as they have a disciplined work, a low amount of power, and (in theory) good leader-member connections. Instead of a relationship-focused coach giving everyone an equal voice in this situation, you would want a task-oriented coach to define the game strategy.
<h3>What is suggested by Fielder's theory?</h3>
Most notably, Fiedler's theory contends that a leader's personality is not the sole factor in determining how effective they are. Instead, this situational theory contends that when people are in settings that support their particular leadership philosophies, they develop into supportive leaders.
Learn more about Fiedler's Contingency Theory: brainly.com/question/20709656
#SPJ1
Answer:
all of the above are the options
I thing b is the answer however, this is more of a subjective question. This question is honestly more about opinion and can be answered differently if you see different points of vue.
The answer is the Columbian Exchange. This refers to a time of social and natural trades between the New and Old Worlds. Trades of plants, creatures, ailments and innovation changed European and Native American lifestyles. Starting after Columbus' disclosure in 1492 the trade kept going during the time of development and revelation.
A
Explanation:
if you look at the map you see Louisiana a black spot and if im not mistaken Mississippi is on the left and Alabama is the to the right
