3 years ago

A historian has a hypothesis about why a country was conquered. What should he do next?

History

2 answers:

Evgesh-ka [11]3 years ago

6 0

He should test his hypothesis through a lot of research so he can have information to back it up
Hope this helps

Alexandra [31]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

B- Test his hypothesis through research.

Explanation: It's just like science, when your doing a project, so we use the same method, but it wouldn't be called a scientific method.

You might be interested in

Which of the following statements is true?

frutty [35]

Answer:

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Who were considered citizens in ancient Athens ?

Natasha_Volkova [10]

The people of Athens were allowed citizenship if they possess a helpful craft that is useful to the city.

7 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me with this????

Luden [163]

Answer:C is the answer

Explanation:The empires were replaced by a new culture bending local traditions, Catholicism and spanish rule

4 0

2 years ago

The creation of _______ allowed humans to shift from a nomadic lifestyle to a more settlement-based lifestyle with domesticated

Levart [38]

Answer: God

Explanation:

God made the heavens and the earth and he made humans too.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was NOT a result of what was NOT a result of

inna [77]

Answer:

I am not completely sure u would have to double check with someone else but I believe that the answer would be B (possibly c but I narrowed it down to those 2 the question was a bit confusing)

8 0

2 years ago