3 years ago

A historian has a hypothesis about why a country was conquered. What should he do next?

History

2 answers:

Evgesh-ka [11]3 years ago

6 0

He should test his hypothesis through a lot of research so he can have information to back it up
Hope this helps

Alexandra [31]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

B- Test his hypothesis through research.

Explanation: It's just like science, when your doing a project, so we use the same method, but it wouldn't be called a scientific method.

You might be interested in

Nixon was able to win the 1968 election for all the following reasons, EXCEPT:

hammer [34]

Answer:

The Democratic Party was divided

Explanation: demo

3 0

3 years ago

My assignment is history

LekaFEV [45]

Can you post the question??

4 0

2 years ago

Explain the chinese attitude towards the western imperialist

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

The Chinese were humiliated by having to pay reparations and allow concessions to the Western powers that effectively denied them control over their own country.

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

What measure did the Populist Party call for to help indebted farmers?

natka813 [3]

Answer:

unlimited coinage of silver

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Event where the redcoats killed five americans

AleksandrR [38]

I think it was near Pennsylvania

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers