Answer:
$417 A.
It is an adverse variance.
Explanation:
Fixed factory overhead volume variance is the difference between budgeted output at 100% normal capacity and actual production volume multiplied by standard fixed overhead cost per unit.
Formula
Fixed factory overhead volume variance = (budgeted standard hours for 100% normal capacity - Actual standard output hours) × standard fixed overhead cost per unit.
Calculation
Since 5900 units of a product was produced in 3.546 standard hours per unit, total actual standard hour is therefore;
= 5900×3.546
=20,921 hours
Overhead cost per unit = $1.10 per hour
Hours at 100% normal capacity = 21,300 hours.
Recall the formula for fixed factory overhead volume variance is =(budgeted standard hours for 100% normal output- actual standard output hours)× standard fixed overhead per unit.
Therefore;
Fixed factory overhead volume variance =(21,300 hours - 20,921 hours)× $1.10
=379 hours × $1.10
=$417 A
It is therefore an adverse variance.
Answer:
Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to every person in the world, from birth until death. ... These basic rights are based on shared values like dignity, fairness, equality, respect and independence. These values are defined and protected by law.
Answer:
A)After the reversing entry is posted for the adjustment made to recognize the salaries expense at the end of the accounting period, the Salaries Expense account will have a zero balance and the Salaries Payable account will have a credit balance
Explanation:
Reversing entry can be regarded as
a journal entry which is been made during an accounting period, it
reverses selected entries that is been made during immediately preceding period. reversing entry typically take placeat the beginning of particular accounting period.
It should be noted thatReversing entries are;
1) made to reverse the effect of certain adjustments.
2) provide a way to guard against oversights, eliminate the review of accounting records, and simplify the entry made in the new period.
3)is the exact opposite (the reverse) of the adjustment.
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
Answer:
The optimal bundle is 6 pairs of dress shoes and 3 pairs of Crocs.
Explanation:
From the question,
Allowance (M) = $450; Price of dress shoes, Pd = $50; Price of crocs, Pc = $50
Note: MRS-price ratio, MUC- marginal utility from consuming casual Crocs ,MUD- marginal utility from consuming dress shoes
Optimal bundle is determined where MRS = Price ratio
MRS = MUC/MUD = 20DC/10C2 = 2D/C
Price ratio = Pd/Pc = 50/50 = 1
So, 2D/C = 1
Therefore, C = 2D
Budget constraint: M = Pd*D + Pc*C
So, 50D + 50*(2D) = 450
50D + 100D = 150D = 450
So, D = 450/150 = 3
C = 2D = 2*3 = 6
