Answer: Rs. 120,000
Explanation:
At the end of the year, both assets and liabilities had doubled. New asset and liability figures are therefore:
Assets = Rs. 200,000
Liabilities = Rs. 100,000
Net income is part of equity and as there is no equity, net income must be the entire equity.
Assets = Equity + Liabilities
200,000 = Equity + 100,000
Equity = 200,000 - 100,000
= Rs. 100,000
From this Net income, dividends were distributed to the tune of Rs. 20,000. This should be added back to see the full figure.
= 100,000 + 20,000
= Rs. 120,000
The three part process for problem solving are:
1. Analyse the problem: take the problem into parts and consider what could be done and what could not be done.
2. Solve for the unknown: decide on a suitable solution based on the results of the analysis that you carried out.
3. Evaluate the answer: Evaluate your solution to see if it the very best you can come up with.
Answer:
b. decrease by $1,000
Explanation:
There is an option below the question ask for details
For computing the profit or loss, first we have to determine the variable cost per unit which is shown below:
= Total variable cost ÷ Number of cases sold
= $144,000 ÷ 9,000 cases
= $16 per cases
The total variable cost would be
= $126,000 + $18,000
= $144,000
And, profit per case is $15
So, the loss per case would be
= $15 per case - $16 per case
= -$1 per case
So, the total loss would be
= 1,000 cases × $1
= $1,000 decrease
Answer:
true , for sure because the lesser the deadweight loss of a tax
In the given scenario, the best informed reaction in Dave's classification is that it would still be classified as invalid. It is because it still lacks evidence and in order to confirm the given result which had said that he is intellectually disabled, they should also assessed his skills of adapting. If his adaptive skills has been assessed, it will then only be considered if the results are correct or not.
