Answer:
a) A scientific hypothesis that leaves fewer facts unexplained is just as adequate as a hypothesis that leaves more facts unexplained. <em>(FALSE)</em>
b) A fully adequate hypothesis addresses all open questions about the phenomenon it is intended to explain. <em>(TRUE)</em>
c) An adequate scientific hypothesis should account for most, but not all, of the facts it is intended to explain. <em>(FALSE)</em>
d) An adequate scientific hypothesis can serve to disprove prior hypotheses that were thought to be adequate. <em>(TRUE)</em>
Explanation:
The correct answer is obscene material.
Answer:
The reason is that the Americans didn't know that war was officially over and that the peace treaty was already signed. The peace was signed in December of 1814, while the battle happened in January of 1815.
Explanation:
We need to have in mind that in this information people still needed a lot of time to obtain certain information from different continent. Literally, you needed someone to transmit information by boat, and it usually needed a couple of months for it. It is interesting that Americans believed that this battle was decisive one.
Confucius was a Chinese philosopher, politician, and teacher whose message of knowledge, benevolence, loyalty, and virtue were the main guiding philosophy of China for thousands of years.
<h3>How does Confucius define virtue?</h3>
Virtues are of supreme importance to Confucius. He wants people to be virtuous in everyday action. He identifies the main virtues to be humaneness, dutifulness, wisdom, good faith, and observance of ritual.
<h3>What are the 4 main principles of Confucianism?</h3>
The concepts of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice and the moral values of these four prima facie principles have been expressly identified in Confucius' ethics.
To learn more about Confucius visit the link
brainly.com/question/10163227
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: Critical thinking
Critical thinking refers to using an objective analysis to create a certain conclusion. Currently, this main of thinking is the one that is used in valid scientific researches because critical thinking is much more likely to produce rational and unbiased result based on factual evidence.
