1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
9

30 POINTS REWARD PLEASE HELP ME!!

History
1 answer:
Snezhnost [94]3 years ago
7 0
Calhoun had resined from his vice president position in 1832 to go back to senate. <span>the </span>Tariff of 1828 also<span> known as the </span>Tariff of Abominations passed through the House of Representitives <span>President </span>John Quincy Adams<span> approved the bill on May 19, 1828, helping to seal his loss to </span>Andrew Jackson<span> in the 1828 presidential election. Later that year in response to the tariff, Vice President </span>John C. Calhoun<span> of South Carolina anonymously penned the </span><span>South Carolina Exposition and Protest</span>.     SO judged on this by protest it means the awnser is 2. hope i was able to help
You might be interested in
Imagine you want to publish a letter in your local newspaper about the people in the article you chose. In your letter, you
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer: Have you ever wondered how fortunate the people are without a government? well i say they are pretty fortunate. i live in the united states and some of the laws are unfair. They put us in a role for god such as men going to jail if they put there hands on a women and as a female i can say that sometimes we do do some horrible things to men but we never expect for them to react because of that law and with that law we feel that we can do all types of things even hurt them when in an altercation but sometimes men can only take so much until they burst                                                                                                                                                  

                                                                                                                                         

this is what i have so far it needs to be corrected a little bit but its good

3 0
2 years ago
Over 60,000 US soldiers died in Vietnam, over 2.1 million Vietnamese soldiers &amp; civilians died in Vietnam, it cost billions
MatroZZZ [7]

Answer:

The war was not worth fighting.

Explanation:

First of all, the American military was ill-prepared for the war because it did not know well what strategy the Vietcong would use against the American soldiers, as they did not expected the war to become almost a guerrilla warfare.

Secondly, the American military and government ignored Vietnam's geography, economy, society and history, and this made it difficult to understand the context, and garner support from the Vietnamese people.

Third, the war was held in a far away country that did not pose any direct threat to American citizens

Finally, the war caused heavy casualties to both sides, including Vietnamese civilians, that did not lead to a victory, since the American military technically lost the war as it had to retreat.

8 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast in the Mexican and the Brazilian revolution.​
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

All revolutions that exist or have taken place in this world are full of the revolution traits that were evidently pointedout throughout the book, Anatomy of Revolution written by Crane Brinton. One classification of the revolution that was mentioned in this piece of literature was, “A revolution is a drastic, sudden substitution of one group in charge of a territorial political entity by another group hitherto not running that government.” Some revolutions may approach this definition in a varied way. Many people think that revolutions only cause trouble and dismay. All the same, have you every considered of a peaceful revolution? Those two words “peaceful” and “revolution” may seem ironic together. Nevertheless, there is a severe illustration that had occurred in the past that proves the existence of this satirical phrase and the unique way of approaching a revolution: the Brazilian Revolution. In addition, I will be comparing the similarities that were showed among the Mexican Revolution and the Brazilian Revolution. Due to the reason of proving that the “peaceful revolution” is still considered an act of Enlightened citizens fighting for their rights. To start out, there are three major parts to the revolution, according to the reading that was in Anatomy of Revolution: cause, sequences, and the consequences. The cause of the revolution mostly states the basic ideas on whyand how the revolution sparked. In this case, Brazilian Revolution, the Portuguese all of a sudden appear out of the blue to the sacred land of Brazil. They were on their way from fleeing their country due to the attack of Napoleon. These unexpected people arrived at the land of Brazil and unbelievingly they start ruling over the natives. Of course the Brazilians were baffled by this action. The Portuguese start taking away the Brazilians’ privileges and rights. To illustrate, the Portuguese banned the Brazilians from trading with foreigners, growing crops or manufacturing goods that have the potential to compete with Spain. In yet another example, if we compare this event to the Mexican Revolution, even during the Mexican revolution, the Spaniards, who came to the land of Mexico

without warning started governing over the Mexicans. They used Mexicans as slaves and they received meager treatment and had to face the harsh reality. They gathered an unreliable amount of taxes from the natives, which, in the end,angered the lower statues and caused the revolt to take place. Even better, during the courses of the revolutions, both the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolutions created a contract of a constitution that had all the requirements of the radicals documented on it. At first, the rulers or the statue who was in absolute power, refused to sign or agree to the constitution. This lead to more riots and conflicts. Some revolutions, such as the Mexican revolution, created bloody wars and fights in order to gain the approval of their constitution. In other cases, such as the Brazilian Revolution, they cause no destruction on people’s lives and they did not carry out bloody wars-they decided to solve problems “peacefully.” After revolting a little more, the head ofthe conservatives decides to sign and be part of the contract, which leads towards the end of the revolution and this is the stage in which the radicals’ desires are fulfilled. In yet another example, the Mexican Revolution created the Inquala plan: whichcontained the three conditions: “One, Mexico would become an independent monarchy governed by transplanted king Ferdinand. Two, Creolles and Pennensulars would have equal human rights and civil liberties. Three, the Roman Catholic Churches could keep their privileges.” More precisely, the Brazilian Revolution created a petition that eight-thousand Brazilians signed, that asked King John to let his son, Dom Pedro, to rule this country. Eventually, Pedro gave the independence to the Brazilian, and he led theconstitutional monarchy in Brazil. Further more, in the end, or in the consequence, it seems that the rebels achieved what they were enthusiastic to posses. In much the same manner, both revolutions, the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolution, had a positive conclusion. Or in other words, they both gained freedom and independence, along with the equal rights and privileges they couldn’t enjoy and taste before. Taking these two revolutions as an example, you can realize that even a “peaceful revolution” canhave the same results as the violent revolution-the Mexican Revolution. Even though the two revolutions went through very similar, but very unique paths, their results were identical, which is all that matters in the end and the only thing that is taken credit

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

~Heaven~

6 0
2 years ago
The systematic killing of a people group by another is called _____. genocide terrorism euthanasia nationalism
erastovalidia [21]
1: Genocide. 2: Poland.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Study the map of projected population growth in Africa. Map of projected population growth in Africa from 2010 to 2050. A key ma
Ainat [17]

Answer:

<u>Most African countries are projected to have at least 60 percent growth.</u>

<u>Explanation:</u>

Remember, we are told to select to statement that best describes the information presented on the map. Also, the term at least also means the minimum of...

A total of 19 countries (11+8); most countries are projected to have at least 60 percent projected growth. How is this evident? Because we are told that 11 countries on the map have an average population growth of 61 to 80 percent, and another 8 countries are over 160 percent. Meaning most African countries are projected to have at least (minimum of) 60 percent growth.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe why slave labor was needed in the Southern colonies.
    12·1 answer
  • Why were these early tanks considered unreliable?
    13·1 answer
  • Along with holding as much territory as possible &amp; hoping the North would grow tired of the war, what other idea gave the So
    9·1 answer
  • Why did most black children receive an inadequate education in the antebellum period?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these factors played an important role on the fall of the kingdom of Ghana
    7·2 answers
  • Much like WWI, which country is the only one to come out of the war economically strong?
    11·1 answer
  • What was an argument of Northern Whigs?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true about the slave trade?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains why Florida and New York have the same number of electoral votes
    14·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!