Answer:
D.) Once the Supreme Court determines a law to be unconstitutional, there is no way for it to be passed.
Explanation:
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
Answer:
The Louisiana State Capitol Building
Explanation:
We need to increase the number we have German D I mean GDP we have the US doesn't increase are we increasing yes we are so what's the treaty so what's my company tell me the company is right in front of us so we're looking around to see the increase
Answer:
I waive any possibility of compensation for injuries that I may receive as a result of participation in this research.
Explanation:
Exculpatory Language is the language used in the consent form to waive or waive the legal rights of the subject from the liability of negligence while performing the research.
<u>Meaning when a university or an individual conduct research on a subject and if something wrong happens to the subject, then this consent language waives the rights of the subject from holding the university or an individual responsible for negligence</u>.
This consent language is usually not allowed in any university to protect the rights of the subject.
