The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
B. Sorry If I wrong because this answer make more since
Answer:
In 1873 the Russians conquered Khiva, and in 1881 they took western Turkmenistan. In 1884 they took the Merv oasis and japanese Turkmenistan. In 1885 further growth south towards Afghanistan changed into blocked by using the British. In 1893–95 the Russians occupied the high Pamir Mountains within the southeast.
Explanation:
Optimal level of arousal is the correct answer.
Each person has a different level of arousal and this level is perfect for them. In order to maintain this level, people will seek for activities that promote their own stimulation. In this case, Joel got his arousal elevated when he went out partying/clubbing, while Natalie was happier when she was able to stay home and read her mystery novels. Thus, their relationship was unlikely to succeed since their optimal arousal level was out of sync.
