Answer:
Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union
Explanation:
Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union
Answer:
I <em>do</em> agree with Roosevelt.
Explanation:
The battle referred in the question is The Battle of San Juan Hill and took place on Jul1 1, 1898, as part of the American-Spanish War. This battle was a very important factor to determine the course of the war. In this battle, Roosevelt was in charge of the Rough Riders (1st United States Volunterr Cavalry). The Battle of San Juan Hill is also considered their biggest triumph.
The Medal of Honor is an award delivered by the President of the US in name of the Congress and it is given to members of the Army, Navy or Air Force who have expressed acts of valor during their service. This battle was won by the Rough Riders, and according to what historians say, Roosevelt was, perhaps, the most important factor. So, according to the standards, I agree with Roosevelt.
The 1920s were a unique time in the United States in the sense that it was a time of great economic prosperity and also great social woe. What led to this tension was a mix of rising immigration levels and and irresponsible attitude towards money and spending.
Answer:
Eventually the plebeians were allowed to elect their own government officials. They elected "tribunes" who represented the plebeians and fought for their rights. They had the power to veto new laws from the Roman senate. As time went on, there became few legal differences between the plebeians and the patricians.
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST???
