I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
dedicated line, virtual circuit
Explanation:
An organization can lease a private dedicated line that is not shared with other users, or a virtual circuit that can be physically configured over shared lines in the carrier's cloud.
With the expression "greek miracle" we designate the appearance scientific knowledge, their achievements include great greek personages who had achieved really big disciplines like literature, history, geometry, mathematics, philosophy, etc, in the other hand the culture has also took biblical sources, which means accumulated knowledge in the sacred scriptures. so that's how Sumerian's achievements spread to other lands.
<u>Problem of classical economics pointed by John Maynard keynes:</u>
He was complaining about economists who believed that unemployment would be reduced or eliminated after the recession if the market is not somehow stimulated or steered in right direction. He agreed that this strategy can work in long run, however, in short run, it would pose some problems due to people’s nature of hoarding money and banking preferences.
The classical economists believed that in the midst of a great depression and recession, the government should not do much and the economy would recover on its own which may take decades for such to happen.
Answer:
stability or change.
Explanation:
Developmental psychology is a theoretical methodology that seeks to understand development, change, and continuity over a lifetime. It is looking at how perception, thought, and actions change during a person's life. Stability vs. Change is one such theory which stresses that stability means that the personality traits present during adolescence endure for a lifetime. Change theories, on the other hand, claim that attitudes are influenced by social relationships, school encounters, and acculturation.
