Formal Operational Reasoning
Obedience to authority would be considered abnormal conduct if you were the king or queen of your realm.
<h3>What does Stanley Milgram's experiment in this regard explain?</h3>
The key themes of Stanley Milgram's well-known obedience experiment are social control and social conformity. Conformity is one result of other people's beliefs, feelings, and behaviors influencing us. Obedience to authority is another way for society to influence you. The act of changing one's behavior in order to accede to a request made by a higher authority is known as obedience.
<h3>What goal did the Milgram Experiment want to achieve?</h3>
Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to find out what people would choose to do when forced to choose between deferring to authority and following their morality and conscience.
<h3>What was the main topic of Milgram's experiment?</h3>
An experiment by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram examined the tension that exists between following orders and following one's conscience. He looked at the defenses put up by individuals indicted in the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials for committing acts of genocide.
Learn more about Milgram's experiment: brainly.com/question/19328289
#SPJ4
Sorry, but may you add the whole question :(
<em>The Declaration of Independence establishes the values of the United States of America. It says that "all men are created equal" and have the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Further, it states the purpose of government is to protect these values.</em>
Elaboration/Explanation:
One big source for Jefferson was John Locke. Locke’s Second Treatise of Government built upon mutual respect for property rights. All free men own property and therefore deserve some rights. The more property, the more rights. Locke like Jefferson believed that kings only earned respect for their rights when they respected the rights and privileges of their subjects.
Jefferson, of course, took this further. He, Franklin, and some other founding fathers essentially ran in radical English circles. Therefore some rights were so important that they do not accrue according to property ownership. Hence, all men were created equal in some respects; even though major property holders were more equal. All men deserved the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Of course, Jefferson understood that large landholders exercised the rights of gentry to guide their poorer neighbors.
