I believe the answer is D
D .Modern monsters can hide within normal society; historical monsters lived outside of society?
Monsters have for ages been demonstrations of society’s suspicions and anxieties. The monster is more than an offensive creature of the thought and it is a kind of sociological class, which was manipulated in realms which is vast as religion, biology, literature, and politics. Historical monsters are
insignias or symbols of a culture’s fantasies which cannot sustain in societies.
In the 21st century, there was human like Hitler and Charles Manson who considered as Modern monsters. As monsters are compared to Evil men, these human monsters also showed the extent of cruelty and brutality by killing the mass population and still could able to sustain within society.
Answer:
6 packages of hot dogs and 6 packages of buns
Explanation:
The indifference curves follow the 45-degree so the ratio for the hot dog:bun will be 1:1. Each package of hot dog gives 8 hot dogs while each package of the bun gives 8 hot dog buns. The ratio of hot dog package: buns package that Sue needs will be:
(number of hot dogs every package)/ (number of buns every package) * (ratio of hot dog : bun)
8/8 * 1/1= 1
The optimal choice package ratio is 1:1, then the amount of food Sue can buy will be: 48$/ (1*$5 + 1*$3)= $48/$8= 6 package.
The optimal choice is 6 packages of hot dogs and 6 packages of buns
I believe the answer is: by themselves, with others, or by themselves
In the beginning of collaborative experiments, all participants would be made to remember a list of items in a secluded room from other (sometimes without even the presence of the experimenters). After the time given is up, they would gather all participants and asked them to recall the memory to see whether the presence of others could affect their memory retrieval.
People with high levels of extrinsic religiosity, who view religion as a means to an end, tend to have high levels of prejudice.
