Answer:
Answer//// Tom Cotton owes Sams garage;//////////////////
Explanation:
Answer:
$12,900
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount of accounts receivable written off during the year
Beginning Balance $5,600
Add Bad debt expense $12,000
(2% x $600,000)
Less End-of-year balance ($4,700)
Accounts receivable written off $12,900
($5,600+$12,000+$4,700)
Therefore the amount of accounts receivable written off during the year will be $12,900
Answer:
Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
Explanation:
What is Partnership
Partnership is a form of business, where individuals come together to carry on business with the primary intention of making profit. Mostly, they come together by contributing capital and expertise to make the business work . Every partner is however liable and responsible for both the profit made and the losses or liabilities of the partnership.
Although the general partner has unlimited liability, every partner is however jointly and severely liable for the business
Were Summemour and Hatcher Liable?
This case is referred in the J.T. Turner Construction Company v. Summerour and Hatcher(2009). The court this case declared that both Hatcher and Summemour were jointly and severally liable as a result of the following reasons.
A partner becomes liable especially for a prior judgment based on the following
1. The partnership has proven indebtedness
2. A general partner in the partnership was sued to court
Based on these, Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE
Answer:
The answer is: A) Autocratic
Explanation:
Autocratic leadership style, also known as authoritarian leadership, is characterized by heavy control by the group's leader. The leader makes all the decisions and doesn't value the subordinates' contributions. Autocratic leaders make decisions based on their ideas and personal judgement, not the others'.
Answer: <em>Option (C) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
<em>A recurrent conclusion of injuries occurred while falling is a long-term pain, medication for these are not taken in consideration among intermediate per-person costs of emergency cure for aged or old individuals's laceration from such falls</em>, if true, will have the tendency to seriously undermines conclusion of argument given in the comprehension.
This states that argument given in the comprehension has not taken in consideration cost for medicine which overall will increase cost. Thereby with an increase in cost the given statement will become untrue since the cost of surgery and medicine combined is higher than cost, in such a case treatment would be more economical. Therefore it undermines conclusion of argument.
