Answer:
1. Companies using FIFO will report the highest gross profit and net income.
2. Companies using FIFO will report the smallest cost of goods sold.
3. Weighted average cost of goods sold will be between FIFO and LIFO costs of goods sold.
4. Companies using FIFO will pay higher taxes than companies using LIFO, assuming all else being equal.
Explanation:
If costs are rising, companies using FIFO will report higher profits simply because they calculate cost of goods sold based on the oldest products which were purchased at a lower cost.
FIFO and LIFO costs will be the extreme points, FIFO showing lowest costs while LIFO will result in the highest costs, while the weighted average will be in between.
Since companies using FIFO report higher profits, they will have to pay more taxes.
<span>In my opinion, the managerial implications of a borderless organization could be a language barrier: complete from a different spoken language to even just day to day colloquial words or phrases. Another could be different labor laws in different countries. Another big one is the fact that different time zones could come into play and if improperly accounted for or organized with, this could really turn business upside down.</span>
Michelle doesn't have to see $90 worth a movie a month, and she could mostly cut that one out, if not completely. She could also see if she is able to lower her internet and/or television bill by downgrading plans.
<span>Apparently,
both programs are well worth the time and investment if you are planning an
information governance project. Hence both AIIM and ARMA have put a lot of
thought and consideration effort into creating programs that offer actionable
insights. Moreover, the ARMA presents their Information Governance Professional
program in six distinct domain areas. On the other hand, if you are a team
member assigned to a governance project and want a better understanding of the
overall process or have a specific focus area, the great option is the AIIM.
However, if you are tasked with being the project manager for an information governance
initiative ARMA’s IGP program might be the better way to go. </span>
Answer:
Total cost = Total ordering cost + Total holding cost
Total cost = DCo + QH
Q 2
Where
D = Annual demand
Co = Ordering cost per order
Q = EOQ
H = Holding cost per item per annum
D = 40,000 units
Co = $48
H = 18% x $8.00 = $1.44
EOQ = √2DCo
H
EOQ = √2 x 40,000 x $48
$1.44
EOQ = 1,633 units
Explanation:
EOQ equals 2 multiplied by annual demand and ordering cost divided by holding cost per item per annum. The holding cost per item per annum is calculated as holding cost rate multiplied by unit cost.
