Answer:
Although there is a slight misunderstanding of the text in the first sentence of the first body paragraph (Nana impacts the story's plot because she had the farm, that the main character went to during the summer and saw the monarchs migrate), this is a misconstruing of an implicit idea in the text and does not ...
Explanation:
Michael punched Jeremy, so Jeremy
Finale, final, ending something of that nature
Answer:
Answer for question 1: Re-enactors will never be able to completely replicate all of the situations and challenges of life in the past. Re-enactors, like historians, suffer limitations that cannot be ignored. A paucity of historical sources, for example, may mean that a recreated regiment can never be certain that its clothes are identical to those worn by troops serving in the regiment in the past. Furthermore, for the reasons of cleanliness and safety, certain characteristics cannot be replicated. Most re-enactment groups attempt to compensate for these inescapable modern effects (such as the use of modern toilets rather than digging a trench and food carried from home rather than scavenged in a nearby village) by striving for a realistic representation in every other manner.
Answer for question 2: In the absence of an audience, mainstream reenactors make an effort to appear real, yet they may fall out of character. Hidden stitches and undergarments may not be period-appropriate, but visible stitches are likely to be made in a period-correct manner. Food served in front of an audience is likely to be historically accurate, although it may not be seasonally or geographically appropriate. Modern things are occasionally utilized "after hours" or in a covert manner. The normal approach is to put on a nice show, but correctness is only required to the extent that others can see it.
Explanation:
Visitors to re-enactment activities obtain an understanding of a particular period. They gain an appreciation of how different life was in the past by simply asking questions, watching how food is prepared over a campfire, and looking at the tents that were used to sleep in. It's a true hands-on experience, since visitors are frequently allowed to sample food, touch uniforms to feel how heavy the cloth is, and learn about the steps involved in firing a musket. Through these contacts with the public, re-enactors pass on their expertise and perspective, making history very accessible. This is what distinguishes re-enactment from more traditional methods of teaching and learning history.
After reading the video transcript we can say Dr. X is convincing because he supports his explanation with facts, as stated in option B and explained below.
<h3>Why is Dr. X effective and convincing?</h3>
In the video "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety," Dr. X is effective at communicating the dangers of cross contamination. The reason for that is the fact that he supports his explanation with facts, that is, he provides evidence that proves his explanation right.
With the information above in mind, we can say Dr. X is convincing when he talks about how bacteria function and what can be done to prevent contamination. Option B is the correct answer.
The complete question with the answer choices can be found attached.
Learn more about food safety here:
brainly.com/question/934835
#SPJ1
