He fears these consequences because <span>not always kind or what people want to hear.</span>
Answer:
B). The confounding of class section (morning, afternoon) and response method (clicker, notebook).
Explanation:
The given research study would not be able to reach a worthy conclusion or results as the study is flawed due to 'the confounding of class section (morning, afternoon) and response method (clicker, notebook).' Thus, the comparison or assessment of two sections through different methods would lead to bafflement or confusion(due to testing different sections of the class(morning, afternoon) through different methods(clicker, notebook) that would restrict the researchers to reach a conclusion. Therefore, the study would not reach a deduction and hence, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
I believe the answer is: <span>uncertainty avoidance
</span><span>uncertainty avoidance refers to an effort that made by individuals to tolerate a certain amount of ambiguity in order to cope with their anxiety.
</span>This could often be spotted in superstition believers, because people like to attributing uncertain situation on the mercy of higher being in order not to held accountable for the outcome.
Answer: Eating while driving increases the risk of accidents.
Explanation:
Driving is a skill which requires complete concentration the use of both hands and both feet. It also requires proper visibility of road ahead and good eye sight of the person driving.
Eating can pose as a source of distraction to the driver who needs to to be absolutely focused on the driving process. This distraction can make the driver unaware of oncoming vehicles/objects which can easily result in an accident.
Also when eating one or both hands required for driving is occupied which is also easy way to get an accident, because in that period the driver hasn't taken total control of his car.
