Answer:
The last answer is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a. The null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

b. A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would happen if it is concluded that the actual mean outstanding credit card debt of college undergraduate is significantly less than $3173, when in fact it does not.
A Type II error is made when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. In this case, the actual mean outstanding credit card debt of college undergraduate is in fact less than $3173, but the test concludes there is no enough evidence to claim that.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have a prior study of the mean outstanding credit card debt of college undergraduate that states that it was $3173 in 2010.
A researcher believes that this amount has decreased since then.
Then, he has to perform a hypothesis test where the null hypothesis states that the mean is still $3173 and an alternative hypothesis that states that the actual credit card debt is significantly smaller than $3173.
The null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Use BODMAS rule :
Bracket , Of , Division , Multiplication , Addition , Subtraction
![\sf{2 \times [ 34 - 5 \times (3 + 1) ] }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Csf%7B2%20%5Ctimes%20%5B%2034%20-%205%20%5Ctimes%20%283%20%2B%201%29%20%5D%20%7D)
Add the numbers : 3 and 1
![\dashrightarrow{ \sf{2 \times [ 34 - 5 \times 4 ] }}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cdashrightarrow%7B%20%5Csf%7B2%20%5Ctimes%20%5B%2034%20-%205%20%5Ctimes%204%20%5D%20%7D%7D)
Multiply the numbers : 5 and 4
![\dashrightarrow{ \sf{2 \times [ 34 - 20 \: ] }}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cdashrightarrow%7B%20%5Csf%7B2%20%5Ctimes%20%5B%2034%20%20-%2020%20%5C%3A%20%5D%20%20%7D%7D)
Subtract 20 from 34

Multiply the numbers : 2 and 14

Hope I helped!
Best regards! :D
Answer: the diameter is 7cm And the radius is 3.5 cm
Step-by-step explanation: