Answer:
31 payments
Explanation:
the present value of the first annuity is:
$1,200 / (1 + 1%)⁸ + $1,200 / (1 + 1%)¹⁶ + $1,200 / (1 + 1%)²⁴ + $1,200 / (1 + 1%)³² + $1,200 / (1 + 1%)⁴⁰ = $1,108.18 + $1,023.39 + $945.08 + $872.76 + $805.98 = $4,755.39
to determine the length of the second annuity:
PV = annuity payment x annuity factor
annuity factor = PV / annuity payment = $4,755.39 / $180 = 26.4188333
using an annuity table we must look for a present value annuity factor that corresponds to 1% interest rate and is close to 26.4188333
the annuity factor is between 30 and 31 payments. Since the final payment has to be less or equal to $180, we have to choose 31 payments.
Answer:
who the hell keeps helping novice businesses people open up? - a business major - yeah the last two were too.
Explanation:
Summary? Left over cash?
Answer:
According to IAS 36 Impairment of assets says that the asset must be recorded at the lower of:
- Net realizable Value $23,000
The lower value is $23,000, which must write off value of inventory with an amount of $3000. So the journal entry would be:
Dr Impairment Losses $3000
Cr Advances paid for inventory $3000
This entry is the fair presentation of the actual value of the advances paid.
Answer:
<h2>Considering absence of collusion,the firms will choose low price in this instance.</h2>
Explanation:
- First,focusing on all the possible payoffs for the firms under low price situation, the possible individual payoffs for the firms are $8 million and $16 million considering that the other firm chooses low price and high price respectively.
- Now, regarding the individual payoffs from choosing high price, the possible payoffs for the firms are $12 million and $4 million, considering that the other firm chooses high price and low price respectively.
- Therefore, notice that considering all possible scenarios,both the minimum and maximum payoffs from choosing low price are actually higher than the same estimates under choosing higher price.
- Hence, to ensure a higher subsequent individual payoff, both the firms would expectedly choose lower price considering the possibilities of both higher minimum and maximum payoff compared to choosing higher price.