Answer:
25%
Explanation:
Given: Sales= $10,000,000
Cost of goods sold= $5000000.
Pre-tax earning= $500000.
Merchandise inventory= $80000.
Total assets= $2000000.
Now, computing the value of return on assets.
Formula;
⇒
⇒
∴ Return on assets=
Hence, Flinger´s return on assets is 25%
Answer:
D. Lavinia will win because Lydia received a legal benefit
Explanation:
In this case, Lavinia is the promisee, since Lydia (the promisor) promised to give her $10,000 if she stopped smoking. Lavinia incurred in a legal detriment when she stopped smoking, simply because she has the smoke if she wants to. Personally, I consider smoking a bad habit, but anyone that smokes is free to do so as long as they comply with the law. A legal detriment is always paired with a legal benefit, even if the action doesn't actually result in a tangible benefit to Lydia.
Answer:
The diagram is well defined showing all the parameters required.
Best Regards.
Answer:
Jane will arrive at an estimate of the value of her seller’s property by calculating the average for the 3 comparable adjusted values that she has obtained.
This means that the value of the property should be around $292,167.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Adjusted values of:
Comparable 1 = $289,500
Comparable 2 295,700
Comparable 3 291,300
Total values = $876,500
Average value = $292,167 ($876,500)
b)A comparative market analysis (CMA) is a series of steps followed to estimate a property's value based on some recently sold and similar properties at same locations as the property being offered for sale or purchase. It is used by the real estate agents and brokers to create their CMA reports, which help the real estate sellers to set the best listing prices for their properties. It is also used by buyers to help them make competitive offers for homes on sale.
Answer:
Ashley may not claim Candy as her dependant even if other requirements are met.
Explanation:
Ashley is single and lives with Barney, her boyfriend, and Candy, his 8-year-old daughter. Ashley paid all of the support for her household in 2018. Barney has earned income of $2,500 and had income tax withheld from his wages. He has no other income and is not required to file an income tax return. With one qualifying child, Barney may claim an earned income credit. Barney files an income tax return solely to obtain a refund of withheld income taxes and does not claim EIC. Because Barney does not have a filing requirement and filed only to obtain a refund of withheld income taxes, Candy is not considered the qualifying child of Barney or any other taxpayer
Based on the explanation given Ashley cannot claim Candy as an independent because of the tax payer rule. If other requirements are met, Ashley cannot claim Candy as dependent because the girl in question isn't her child . Moreover, Candy is the full responsibility of Barney. Candy is under Barney's care and is solely required by law to take care of her.