Why was the great wall of china considered a zone of transition

1 answer:

7 0

The Great Wall is a fortificated East-to-West line which historically has delimited the Chinese Northern border. Its primary purpouse was to defend the Chinese territory against the invasions and quick raids organized by the nomadic people from the Eurasian Steppe lands, located more to the North.

But rather than as a fixed border, it should be regarded as a transition zone which establishes a distinction between two different lifestyles, even nowadays: the farmer regions in the South with sedentary ways of life and the pasture lands in the North, where its inhabitants have nomadic lifestyles and work mainly in animal husbandry activities.

You might be interested in

Hello please help i’ll give brainliest but you gotta answer correctly

TEA [102]

Answer: I think the answer is Riverbed. Let me know if I'm right or not.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Black leader Dr. W. E. B. Du Bois

Alekssandra [29.7K]

C. Demanded complete equality for African Americans

3 0

3 years ago

Which engineer designed and built a 984-foot-tall iron and steel tower in Paris to celebrate the centennial of the French Revolu

Sav [38]

I'm sure the answer is: A. Gustav Eiffel, but in school I learned that Stephen Sauvestre was the one who built it.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The ____ and exaltation of Christ reversed His _____.

cricket20 [7]

Answer:

resurrection

death

Explanation:

The resurrection of Jesus, according to the New Testament is the act of the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. The resurrection of Jesus is the basic religious truth in Christianity. Resurrected, Jesus overcame death. This biblical act is celebrated by Christians as Easter.

Most of the Christian churches accept the resurrection of Jesus as a historical fact of great importance to their faith. More liberal Christians do not believe in the physical, but only in the spiritual resurrection.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?

Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence

Explanation:

History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.

For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.

However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.

Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.

While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.

3 0

3 years ago