Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option C.
Most artwork does not meet criteria for patent.
Explanation: There can be several reasons behind the rejection of the patent of artwork created by Sherry.
Patent is the individual property protection law which is a bit different from the copyright law or the trade mark law.
There are two types of patent. One is utility patents and another is design patents. The design patents are the protection the design not the protection of the idea behind the design.
However if the art work is a visual painting than it does not meet the criteria of the patent. Because an artwork is not an invention which can be protected under the patent law. Basically the visual art is an idea of the artist. So ideas can not be protected under the patent law.
Therefore it is not meeting the criteria of the patents. So it might be the best possible reason for rejecting the patent application of Shelly.
Answer:
Answer is clinical psychology.
Explanation:
Clinical psychology involves the treatment of mental illness and behavioral difficulties. The psychologist will help the client in identifying emotional or mental problems. This is done through interviews, where he diagnose existing or potential disorders. The psychologist made use of talk therapy only for treatment .
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
Your friend's words represent an injunctive norm.
Hope that helped :)
Also maybe add the choices so people aren't as confused :)
Article 2A (leases) of the UCC directly addresses personal property leases. Article 2A covers all leases of goods. This was added to the Uniform Commercial Code in 1987. By adding this into the UCC, they were able to establish laws that govern what is acceptable and unacceptable pertaining to personal property leasing.
