Answer:
C. She will prevail, because the maid's failure to lock the door created the risk that someone might enter and take the homeowner's valuables.
Explanation:
The owner of this house would win this case given that the the house cleaners negligence was what exposed her home to criminal activity. Such criminal acts can be foreseen. An open door increases the risk of theft. By not locking the door, the maid was negligent and she caused the theft to happen. This makes the agency liable for the maids negligence since they happen to be her employer
Answer:
More House Democrats shifted from oppposing to favoring the law.
Explanation:
Based on the previous works, Durkheim felt that creating a society without crime would be <u>impossible</u>.
<h3>Emile Durkheim</h3>
Emile Durkheim is a famous French sociologist who was generally considered as one of the fathers of modern social science alongside the likes of Karl Max and Max Weber.
In one of his submissions, he concluded that it is <u>impossible</u> to create a society without crime.
According to him, some minor crimes are essential and valuable to society. Otherwise, society could not exist without it.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Impossible</u>."
Learn more about Durkheim here: brainly.com/question/8837353
Economics focuses more on interactions/marketing/ those type of focus
Answer:
Farmers
Explanation:
I took the test; it was correct.
