Answer:
Great Plains
Explanation:
The Great Plains are flat lands or plain land that has no building or farmland on it. They are often covered with grass and are located in the United States and Canada.
This great plain enables wind to blow uncontrollably without hindrances because the environment are free, no houses. This inturn can be of great benefit especially in term of wind energy because wind power holds great promise for the United States because of the GREAT PLAINS and experts believe wind energy could meet as much as 20 percent of the nation’s energy needs. Therefore GREAT PLAIN are often use to conserve energy in the United State due to the environment.
GREAT PLAINS lies in west of the Mississippi River tallgrass prairie in the United States and east of the Rocky Mountains in the U.S. and Canada
Today, tribal governments maintain the power to determine their own governance structures, pass laws, and enforce laws through police departments and tribal
Answer:
Conservative.
Explanation:
The term 'conservative' is used to denote 'someone who usually supports or favors the maintenance of status quo' and denies any kind of change or modification in the conventional institutions or beliefs. These people usually tend to show support, in fact rigidity to the 'social as well as economic status quo' and tend to show an opposition towards the introduction of any kind of new political arrangements or economic formulas that they view as a threat to their existing authority of beliefs/status quo. Therefore, such a person would be considered as 'conservative' in present context.
Likely rule against Mark.
Mark and Charles had an oral agreement over a few years and nothing was put into writing. This would trigger the statute of frauds, wherein certain types of agreements are required to be memorialized in writing.
This means that there is a situation in which two people are having to be taken at their word. On top of that, the agreement was made while they were impaired.
If a court didn't rule against Mark at the outset, there would be an investigation into whether the agreement was enforceable, how impaired they were, whether anyone else heard them, and what the historic uses were but there isn't enough time for a prescriptive easement or adverse possession. But this is likely a summary judgment case based on statute of frauds.
You put this under social studies but look at the last digit of each number 0-4 is when you round down 5-9 is when you round up therefore you answer will be 30+90=120
