Answer: Supply curve - Increases rightwards
Market Price - Falls
Economic Profit - Decreases
Explanation: Perfect Competition market structure is with large number of buyers & sellers , homogeneous products & uniform prices , perfect information and free entry and exit.
'Free Entry and Exit' implies - no firm earns super normal (economic) profits or abnormal losses in long run. When firms are earning economic profits in short run, new firms enter (because of free entry) & the industry supply increase reducing price , which further reduces the super normal profits to normal profits in long run. Similarly - Abnormal losses make firms exit (freely), reduce supply & increase price , hence reducing abnormal losses & resuming normal profits.
Answer: Costs of items used up this period but paid for next period
Explanation:
Period Expenses for the period are transactions that should be expensed because they were used in the current period.
Therefore if a period cost is not used in the period, it is not considered a period cost even if the company pays for it in the current period which also means that if a period cost for the period is not paid in the current period but in the next one, it is still a period cost for the current period.
From the above therefore, the period cost is the cost of items used up in this period but paid for in the next one.
The land purchased might look like the obvious choice but it is not because Assets are capitalised and not expensed.
The selling price per hat is mathematically given as
S=$62
<h3>What is t
he selling price per hat?</h3>
Direct labor hours required to produce first 100 hats=10hr
Direct labour cost =20hr*60$/hour = $1200
Other Direct cost =100hats*19$/hat = $1900
Total Direct cost. = $3100
Selling price is 200% of Direct production cost
$3100*200% = $6200
The selling price per hat = $6200 / 100hats
The selling price per hat = $62
In conclusion, The selling price per hat = $62
Read more about selling price
brainly.com/question/28017453
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
Answer:
Yes, I agree
Explanation:
As managers in an organization, proper attention must be paid to the forces in the external environment because these forces are dynamic and business cannot exist without them hence must align with these changes inorder to be successful.
Some of theses forces have direct impact with an organization such as customer's reaction to a company's product, how well the company stays ahead of it's competitors , suppliers and creditors. External forces in the environment that have indirect impact to a company are compliance with local laws, socio cultural forces, religion etc.
Practical examples
• Customer's reaction to a product speaks to what measures are taken by a company to improving the quality of products produced and sold. Favourable reaction would make the company succeed while unfavourable reaction could mar the company's performance.
• Level of compliance with local laws is also an important force in the external environment that must be adhered to. If a company must succeed, it must comply with local laws and order, failure to do so could result to fine or expulsion from the community.
