Answer:
Letter C is correct. <u>Person by situation interaction.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is a cognitive process that occurs through the individual perspective of each human being. This implies that our behavior is not totally conditioned by an automatic response predetermined by any variables, but what determines our way of being and acting is the set of learnings, memories, thoughts and perceptions about certain situations as well. as the process of social interaction, which determines how the experiences and actions lived by an individual in society will actively influence their tastes, actions and perceptions about society in general.
Answer:
Part 1
Dr Lease rentals $300........ Expense
Cr Cash Account $300
Part 2
Dr Leased Equipment $63,536
Cr Finance Lease Liability $63,536
Explanation:
Part 1. Under the operating leases the lessee pays the monthly rentals which must be accounted for as an expense and the double entry is as under:
Dr Lease rentals $300........ Expense
Cr Cash Account $300
Part 2. Under the finance lease agreement, the lessee pays the value of the asset and the interest as well. So after the date of agreement when the asset is handed over the journal entry would be recording of the equipment received, which would written at its fair value or present value of the payments made. The journal entry would be:
Dr Leased Equipment $63,536
Cr Finance Lease Liability $63,536
Answer:
$1,172.97
Explanation:
We use the Present value formula i.e to be shown in the attached spreadsheet. Kindly find it below:
Given that,
Assuming figure Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 1.9% + 0.85% = 2.75%
NPER = 5 years
PMT = $1,000 × 6.5% = $65
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the price of the bond is $1,172.97
In this way, Tata Nano's value proposition offered buyers both differentiation and low cost, putting an automobile within reach of mostI Indiansfor the first time. Tata Motors matched its compelling value proposition with a spelling profit proposition.
Answer: likely to be well-founded since CEO compensation at many U.S. companies has actually increased even when the company performed poorly
Explanation:
The options to the question are:
A. unfounded, since laws in the United States prevent firms from paying large salaries or bonuses to executives when a firm reports a loss.
B. based on an erroneous conclusion, because CEO pay is always based on a formula tied to the company's profits and losses.
C.likely to be well-founded since CEO compensation at many U.S. companies has actually increased even when the company performed poorly.
D. not entirely unfounded, but he needs to realize that the pay received by most chief executives must be reinvested in the company if it's unprofitable for three years in a row.
From the question, we are informed that Paulo owns a few shares of stock in a large and diversified firm na that he noticed that the CEO of the company is responsible for a multi-billion dollar business, but is upset with what he feels is excessive compensation for the CEO particularly since the firm has reported losses for the past two years.
Paulo's concerns are likely to be well-founded since CEO compensation at many U.S. companies has actually increased even when the company performed poorly.
