Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Tori has been a personal secretary for the Governor for the past three years. During this time, Tori has observed what he considers to be insincerity on the part of the Governor with regards to interest in social causes. Tori has seen money that was to go to schools and children's hospitals questionably disappear. The Governor is more interested in spending the federal government's money for his own agenda than for helping people.
Tori reasons, "The public has a right to be treated fairly. He is violating the rights of these children. I need to gather more information and, if I am right, I need to report this behavior." Which philosophy best depicts Tori's reasoning:"
Answer:
Virtue ethics
Explanation:
Virtue ethics is a philosophy that refers to the emphasis on the moral virtues of the human being. Through this philosophy, people seek to do what is right, what is centered on honesty, transparency and the highest ethical and moral standards.
When Tory decides to expose the acts of dishonesty that her governor promotes, she is trying to do something fair and just, which will intensify her honesty and allow people to have justice. This shows that she is committed to the ethical philosophy of virtue.
Answer:
The Roman Empire was considered to rule the trade networks that went through the Mediterranean, but had to fight against Carthage for full control. ... Ivory, spices, slaves, wine, weapons and many other materials were traded, and expanded the economic system of the Mediterranean Sea.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is- Sue the restaurant for negligence
Explanation:
A negligence lawsuit is a civil lawsuit that filed against a person or a legal party that failed to use reasonable caution and caused damage to a victim while providing care or services.
In order to be sued for Negligence, the Defendant must have owed a duty to the Plaintiff. There are two kinds of duty that a defendant could owe the plaintiff. The first is the general "duty of care" which is duty to conduct yourself as a reasonable person. The second duty is a "special duty" imposed by statute or case law which may exist either in addition to, or in place of the regular duty of care
The defendant must breach his duty in order to be liable for negligence.
The breach of duty must have caused harm to the patient.
If the plaintiff suffers any harm he or she can sue for negligence.
In this scenario, Nolan's restaurant is liable for negligence because they failed in the duty of care and as a result it caused harm to one of their customer. This enables the customer to be able to sue the restaurant for negligence.
Answer:
Archery.
Badminton.
Cricket.
Bowling.
Boxing.
Curling.
Tennis.
Skateboarding.
Yoga
Fencing
Fitness
Gymnastics
Karate
Weightlifting
I think this should be enough.
The first alternative is correct (A).
<u>An appellate court is one that re-judges the judgments stipulated by lower courts. </u>This is a way of diminishing the chance of a process containing vices, that is, of some disproportionate or partial penalty. This is a way of ensuring the broad legal process for all American citizens. If the citizen did not agree to the sentence, he can appeal to the courts of appeal.
Courts of appeal exist at federal or state level, but the object of both is the same: to reaffirm or change the penalties stipulated by lower courts.
