Answer:
1.- financial advantage for $31,720
2.- the minimum price can be 6.80 dollars
Explanation:
For the special order we should only consider the variable cost as will not alter the fixed cost structure for the firm:
sales price $ 19.00
variable cost
Direct Materials 1.70
Direct Labor 3.00
Variable overhead 0.60
Variable S&A <u> 1.50 </u>
Total variable: 6.80
contribution per unit: $12.2
total contribution for 2,600 units: $31,720
2.- the inferior units can be sold for the variable cost to avoid a negative contribution.
Answer:
studying
Explanation:
The coming together by students not to study is an example of collusion in an oligopoly.
An Oligopoly is when there are few large firms operating in an industry. Collusion is when people come together and decide on a particular course of action. It is usually non competitive
The dominant strategy here is to study.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other players are doing.
the students prefers to study more and get an A or to study the same amount as other students and get a C. Her least preferred option is an F. Since she does not know the actions of the other students, are best option is to study
Answer:
The answer is:
* Expected return on the market: 2.74%
* Risk-free rate: 11.45%
Explanation:
Denote Rm is expected return on the market and Rf is risk-free rate. We have:
* For stock Pete: 14.5% = Rf + 1.35 x ( Rm - Rf) and
* For stock Repete: 11.8% = Rf + 1.04 x (Rm-Rf)
From the two equations above, we have: 0.31 * (Rm- Rf) = 2.7% <=> Rm - Rf = 8.71%;
So we have: 14.5% = Rf + 1.35 * 8.71% <=> Rf = 2.74%;
=> Rm = 2.7% + Rf = 8.71% + 2.74% = 11.45%.
So, Rf = 2.74%; Rm = 11.45%.
Understand the needs of your customers; sales, transportation, the whole supply chain. Take function and brand into account. Reduce, minimise and optimise packaging materials. Reduce packaging waste, use recyclable lightweight materials, biodegradable, compostable materials and renewable resources.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": willing to pay money (reduce their income) to enforce their own sense of fairness.
Explanation:
The "ultimatum game" is an economic strategy in which two individuals are gathered knowing they will see each other only once. The first individual is in charge of proposing an offer on diving an amount of money. If the second individual rejects the offer neither one of them gets anything. If the second individual accepts the offer, the first individual obtains what was demanded and the rest goes for the second individual.
Thus, <em>the "ultimatum game" shows how someone (the second individual) could turn down a unique offer that does not meet his or her demands. This, with plain knowledge the offer another individual could provide, might be worse, thus, reducing the chances to obtain what is desired for defending his or her sense of fairness.</em>
