Answer:
The correct answer is Future value with compound interest and $478.25.
Explanation:
According to the the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Present value (PV) = $400
Rate of interest = 6%
Rate of interest ( compounded quarterly) (rate) = 1.5%
Time period = 3 years
Time period ( compounded quarterly) ( Nper) = 12
So, we have to calculate Future value with compound interest because it is asking for a amount after 3 year.
So, we can calculate the future value by using financial calculator.
The attachment is attached below.
So, FV = $478.25
Explanation:
Looking from a fair point of view, the White owners of businesses have legitimate reasons to feel that the Act constitutes illegal reverse discrimination.
Remember, reverse discrimination implies an unfair treatment of the majority group (White owners) in an effort to please the minority group. This is evident from the fact that the 10 percent of all federal grants to be released by the Economic Development Administration was only to be used to purchase services or supplies from businesses owned and controlled by U.S. citizens belonging to one of six minority groups excluding the White business owners; making the White owners feel discriminated against.
Thus, unintentionally the Act became a reverse discrimination on White business owners.
Given the following parameters:
The employer pays the employee (gross earnings) – $1,200
The employer pays for social security and medicare taxes – $91.80
The employer pays for the Federal
Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) – $9.60
The employer pays for the State
Unemployment Tax Act (SUTA) – $64.80
The total cost of this employee to the employer is the summation of all these costs
1,200 + 91.80 + 9.60 + 64.80 = $1366.20
Answer:
the total trade receivable is $12,300
Explanation:
The computation of the total trade receivable is shown below:
= note due from customer + Due and unpaid from this month's sales + Due and unpaid from last month's sales
= $1,570 + $9,730 + $1,000
= $12,300
Hence, the total trade receivable is $12,300
The other items would not be considered as it is not a trade receivables
Answer: 1. D. Economic entity
2. C. Circumstances prevent the exercise of control.
3. B. Consolidation used for both Sell and Vane.
4. B. In form, the companies are separate; in substance, they are one entity
Explanation:
1. When a parent–subsidiary relationship exists, it can be infered that consolidated financial statements will be prepared in recognition of the accounting concept of economic entity.
2. Consolidated financial statements are prepared when one company has a controlling interest in another unless the circumstances prevent the exercise of control.
3. Based on the information given, in Penn’s consolidated financial statements, it should be noted that Sell and Vane should be consolidated. Therefore, the correct option is B.
4. The best theoretical justification for consolidated financial statements is that in form, the companies are separate while in substance, they are regarded as one entity.
