Explanation:
You can go to Microsoft words or Power point..
These can help you type your presentation or if on phone you can go to normal Notes app or word app....
I hope this helps you
Answer:
a. Debit Retained earnings $53,200; credit Dividends $53,200.
Explanation:
When we close the journal entries, we close all the temporary accounts such as revenues, expenses, and dividends. Closing means the balance of revenues, expenses, and dividends will be "0". To make "0" balance of any temporary accounts, we have to reverse the balance as normal balance. For example - Service revenue is a credit balance. If we close it, we have to make service revenue as a debit account. Similarly, to close the dividends account,
The journal entry to record the closing of dividends is -
Retained earnings (Debit)
Dividends (Credit)
Answer:
Proportional tax system
Explanation:
A proportional tax system levies an equal tax rate on everyone regardless of their income level. It is also known as the flat-rate tax because it treats the wealthy, middle class, and low-income earners equally. The proportional tax system simplifies tax filing as the same tax rate will apply to everyone.
The proportions tax system contrasts with the progressive tax system, which bases the tax rate on the taxpayer's income.
Answer:
The interviewer does not begin the interview in a neutral state, reacting only to information presented and the behavior of the applicant in the interview.
Explanation:
Robert Dipboye postulated that an interviewer should use both structured and unstructured interview method when interacting with a potential employee.
This aims to look beyond the job description and to get a better candidate as a fit for the role.
Structured interview uses a standard set of questions to evaluate a candidate, while unstructured interview allows the interviewer to ask questions aimed at getting information in regards to a skill or trait.
Using this method, the interviewer does not begin in a neutral state. But rather his reaction is based on the information presented by the candidate and his behaviour.
If someone believe that is never ethical to eat meat, they believe that right or wrong is defined by personal belief/prejudice
They didn't use god and religion as their right and wrong guidebook, and they also don't use concrete facts as for why is it wrong for human to eat animal unless "because they also have feelings" argument