I believe the answer to this question is that Salim has high emotional intelligence. As a result, he can reccognize other people's emotion easily. A trait he exhibits to cope.
Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
Sociologists work to understand the experiences of all people equally, but achieving such parity is not always possible due to discrepancies in attention and funding.
<h3>Why are sociologists unable to understand experiences equally?</h3>
Ideally, sociologists strive to be able to research the experiences of all types of people on Earth. This would allow them to make better conclusions on human behavior.
Sadly, it is not possible to treat everyone with equality and parity because there are different levels of attention and funding based on the type of people being studied.
Find out more on sociologists at brainly.com/question/2794183
#SPJ1
Giving up privacy and having multiple aspects of their life watched at all times by press.
The best answer is A.
Interest is a fee paid for the use of another party's money. To the borrower it is the cost of renting money, to the lender it is the income from lending it.
There are two kinds of interest. Simple interest or nominated interest is money earned from the money that has been deposited in an account, but not on the money the account earns.
Compound interest is money earned from the money that was originally put into an account (principal) plus the money that the interest earns. The interest also earns interest too.
The interest earned on the principal is regularly added to the balance.
The validity of an argument that has a false premise and a false conclusion is said to be either valid or invalid.
<h3>What is the validity of an argument?</h3>
The validity of an argument as it applies to deductive reasoning shows that an argument is valid if the premises are true and the conclusion is also true.
- However, If an argument has false premises and a false conclusion, then the argument may be either valid or invalid.
To assess if an argument is valid, start by assuming that all of the premises are true, and then consider whether the conclusion must also be true.
- If you answered yes to this question, then your argument is valid;
- If you answered no, then your argument is invalid.
However, simply knowing that both the premises as well as the conclusion are false is insufficient knowledge to answer this argument one way or the other, because certain arguments with false premises and a false conclusion are valid, while others are invalid.
Learn more about the validity of an argument here:
brainly.com/question/859848
