1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikklg [1K]
3 years ago
5

Suppose that two Japanese companies, Hitachi and Toshiba, are the sole producers (i.e., duopolists) of a microprocessor chip use

d in a number of different brands of personal computers. Assume that the total demand for the chips is fixed and that each firm charges the same price for the chips. Each firm’s market share and profits are a function of the magnitude of the promotional campaign used to promote its version of the chip. Also assume that only two strategies are available to each firm: a limited promotional campaign (budget) and an extensive promotional campaign (budget). If the two firms engage in a limited promotional campaign, each firm will earn a quarterly profit of $11 million. If the two firms undertake an extensive promotional campaign, each firm will earn a quarterly profit of $8 million. With this strategy combination, market share and total sales will be the same as for a limited promotional campaign, but promotional costs will be higher and hence profits will be lower. If either firm engages in a limited promotional campaign and the other firm undertakes an extensive promotional campaign, then the firm that adopts the extensive campaign will increase its market share and earn a profit of $16 million, whereas the firm that chooses the limited campaign will earn a profit of only $4 million.
a. Develop a payoff matrix for this decision-making problem.
b. In the absence of a binding and enforceable agreement, determine the dominant advertising strategy and the minimum payoff for Hitachi.
c. Determine the dominant advertising strategy and the minimum payoff for Toshiba

Business
1 answer:
Dima020 [189]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Please refer to Explanation

Explanation:

a) When both Hitachi and Toshiba engage in a limited campaign, they both earn $11 million.

If both engage in an extensive campaign they both earn $8 million.

However, if one firm engages in an extensive campaign and the other firm engages in a limited one, the firm engaging in a limited campaign earns $4 million while the one engaging in an extensive campaign earns $16 million.

I have attached a photo to show the payoff matrix as a table.

b) In the absence of a binding and enforceable agreement, that is to say that if both firms are not colluding, Hitachi's dominant strategy would be to engage in an EXTENSIVE PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN.

A Firm's dominant strategy in absence of an agreement is that strategy that a firm can go on and make a maximum amount of profit regardless of what the other firm does.

Should Hitachi engage in an Extensive Campaign, they will make $16 million in quarterly profit if Toshiba engages in a Limited Campaign. Should Toshiba also decide to engage in an Extensive Campaign, then Hitachi makes a profit of $8 million. This is therefore their best alternative as opposed to embarking on a limited Campaign where there is a chance that they will make $4 million.

With the Extensive Campaign, Hitachi's Minimum Payoff is $8 million.

c) The game is the same for both players so the best option for Hitachi, is the best option for Toshiba as well. This means that Toshiba's dominant Strategy is an EXTENSIVE PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN and their minimum payoff is $8 million as well.

You might be interested in
Thayer Farms stock has a beta of 1.38. The risk-free rate of return is 3.87 percent, the inflation rate is 3.93 percent, and the
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

Cost of Equity  16.33%

Explanation:

We solve for this using CAMP:

Ke= r_f + \beta (r_m-r_f)

risk free = 0.0387

premium market = (market rate - risk free) 0.0903

beta(non diversifiable risk) = 1.38

Ke= 0.0387 + 1.38 (0.0903)

Ke 0.16331 = 16.33%

We are given with the risk free rate of return and the market premium already so we just need to plug into the formula to solve for the expected return on the stock.

8 0
3 years ago
List the four stages of ability development. Provide an example of a person developing a specific ability. What would each stage
docker41 [41]
<span>Jean Piaget was a Swiss philosopher and psychologist who introduced a theory of cognitive development like Sigmund Freud Jean thought human development can be described in stages (of course leaving the sexuality part of Freud out). The stages are:
</span>Sensorimotor. Birth through ages 18-24 months (Explorer)

Preoperational. Toddler-hood (18-24 months) through early youth (age 7) 
(<span> children learn to think abstractly, understand symbolic concepts, and use language etc.)
</span>
Concrete operational. Ages 7 to 12 (Understanding complexities)

Formal operations: Pre-adulthood through adulthood (H<span>ypothetical, and theoretical reasoning)</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jermaine Dye Corporation acquired two inventory items at a lump-sum cost of $50,000. The acquisition included 3,000 units of pro
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

Gross profit=15,000-9,375=$5,625

Explanation:

Gross profit can be calculated by the any corporation as follows:

Gross profit: Sales- Cost of sales

In given scenario, sales and cost of sales can be determined as follows:

Sales=Number of LF units sold by Jermaine Dye Corporation*sale price per unit of LF

       =1,000*15=$15,000

The corporation is selling LF for 15$ which is 3 times the price at which it is selling 1B and assuming that the entity is earning same gross profit margin on both products, then cost of sales can be determined as follows:

Lets say that cost of one unit of "1B" is "z" then the cost of one unit of "LF" will be "3z" and following equation can be formed for cost of sales:

3,000(3z)+7,000(z)=50,000

9000z+7000z=50,000

16,000z=50,000

z=$3.125(50,000/16,000)=cost of one unit of 1B

Cost for one unit of LF=3*3.125=$9.375

Cost of sales for 1,000 units=9.375*1000=$9,375

Gross profit=15,000-9,375=$5,625

5 0
3 years ago
Ed bought $2,000 in stock shares one week before the stock price dropped $10.00. If he had waited for the price setback, he coul
Zanzabum

Answer:

He bought 40 shares.

Explanation:

<em>Step 1: Determine the initial stock price</em>

Use the expression below to determine the total initial stock price as shown;

T=S×s

where;

T=total initial stock price

S=initial stock price per share

s=number of shares

In our case;

T=$2,000

S=x

s=unknown

replacing;

2,000=x×s

s=2,000/x

<em>Step 2: Determine the final stock price</em>

Use the expression below;

F=f×s2

where;

F=final stock price=$2,000

f=final stock price per stock=(x-10)

s2=final number of shares bought=(2,000/x)+10

replacing;

2,000=(x-10){(2,000/x)+10)

2,000=x(2,000/x)+(10 x)-10(2,000/x)-100

(2,000=2,000+10 x-20,000/x-100)x

2,000 x=2,000 x+10 x²-20,000-100 x

2,000 x-2000 x=10 x²-100 x-20,000

10 x²-100 x-20,000=0

solving quadratically;

x=[100±√{100²-(4×10×-20,000)}]/(2×10)

x={100±√(10,000+800,000)}/20

x=(100±900)/20

x=1,000/20=50

Initial stock price=$50

Number of shares bought=2,000/x=2,000/50=40

He bought 40 shares.

4 0
3 years ago
Imagine that instead of hiring each assitant right away in the hiring assistant problem. we wait until the end to hire the best
vlada-n [284]

Imagine that instead of hiring each assistant proper away withinside the hiring assistant problem. we wait till the cease to lease the quality one. what is the quality-, worse- and average-care costs on this case.

There are some assumptions that we are able to make.

Worst case: Every assistant you interview subsequent is higher than the ultimate candidate. So, you need to pass until the cease. The aspect is you interviewed until the cease N, and also you needed to make a contrast with the N-1 interviewee.

So, your complexity can be N*(N-1) = O(N^2)

Best case: The first actual candidate you interviewed became out to be the quality candidate. Here you simply examine with every other candidate if they're higher than the first candidate or not.

So, your complexity, on this case, can be O(N)

Average case: In this case, we're creating a contrast with different candidates. In this case, as well, your complexity could be O(N^2).

For higher clarity, what you may do is navigate grade by grade the subsequent pseudocode:

best_candidate_index = 0

for candidate in range(number_of_interviewee)

do interview candidate

if candidate is higher than best_candidate_index

best_candidate_index = candidate

lease best_candidate_index

Learn more about costs here:
brainly.com/question/28147009

#SPJ4

7 0
10 months ago
Other questions:
  • Indicate the accounts affected and enter decreases to account categories with a minus sign. a. At the end of the period, bad deb
    15·1 answer
  • Hey guys its emogoth i needed to make a new one
    5·1 answer
  • You are a member of the marketing team at the dannon company, inc. the company makes a variety of yogurt products including one
    11·1 answer
  • The following information is available for completed Job No. 402: Direct materials, $120,000; direct labor, $180,000; manufactur
    14·1 answer
  • Janelle, one of Abdul’s employees, has performed poorly on many aspects of her job since she was hired four months ago. This is
    13·1 answer
  • Nederlander's Audience Rewards program strongly benefits small privately-owned theaters and show producers who back the company
    9·1 answer
  • How can being a team player contribute to the salesperson’s success? To the success of the salesperson’s business?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statements are true? Check all that apply: C-corporations are subject to double taxation. LLCs are best for taking venture
    10·1 answer
  • Does anyone’s else’s teacher do this and does not let you complete the test-
    6·1 answer
  • total fixed costs for diamong enterprises are $700,000. Total costs, including both fixed and variable, are $920,000 if 140,000
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!