Answer:
Nonstructured pricing
Explanation:
Nonstructured pricing is also called copy cat method of pricing and involves a pricing that is based on prices charged by similar businesses for a product or service. The business copy cats the prices of competitors. On the other hand structured pricing is done based on the firm's internal determination of the value of a product.
A restaurateur visits two restaurants with themes similar to his and prices his menu to approximate the prices charged for similar dishes at the other restaurants. He is using no structured pricing.
Answer:
a) Process A is the bottleneck of the process
b) Hourly capacity = 60 / bottlenecktime = 60/25 = 2.4 units / hour
Explanation:
Part 1 is processed at A for 15 minutes and then at B for 10 minutes.
Thus part 1 take 15 + 10 i.e. 25 minutes two complete both processes
Part 2 is processed at C for 20 minutes.
Output from B and C i.e. part 1 and 2 respectively are fed to process D where the time taken to assemble is 15 minutes
Thus looking at the given data,
Part 1 takes longer time i.e. 25 minutes to reach process C compared to part 2 i.e. 20 minutes
So bottleneck occurs at process A and B because it takes maximum time i.e. 25 minutes
a) Process A is the bottleneck of the process
b) Hourly capacity = 60 / bottlenecktime = 60/25 = 2.4 units / hour
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
Answer:
the answer is option D)<u>Equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food</u>
Explanation:
The theory of consumer behavior states that "consumers allocate incomes among different goods and services to maximize their utility"
Consumer behavior revolves around three parameters their preferences, budget constraints, and options available.
The budget constraint will definitely influence the choice of what to buy within the options available to maximize utility. That means how the bill is shared among the three friends will ultimately affect how much they will chose to eat.
Secondly, The vegetarian will not be better off with equal sharing of the bill because the cost of his food according to the data provided is less.
We don not know for sure if the wine drinker drinks too much or whether he will want his other friends to foot the extra bill from the cost of his wine but we are certain that equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food.
Answer:
$16.93
Explanation:
Current stock price = dividend ( 1 + growth rate) / required return - growth rate
$1.4(1.04) / 0.126 - 0.04 = $16.93